MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4291116993 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.008

Left ventricular thrombus with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Novel technique of bronchoscope-guided thrombus retrieval

2022· article· en· W4291116993 sur OpenAlex
Jennifer L. Perri, Georg Wieselthaler

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationThrombusCardiogenic shockCardiologyIntracardiac injectionInternal medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageA flexible bronchoscope is used as an adjunct to retrieve LV thrombus through an aortotomy; the scope improves visualization and ease of clot retrieval. Every year approximately 2500 patients in the United States receive venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiogenic shock.1Hayanga J.W.A. Aboagye J. Bush E. Canner J. Hayanga H.K. Klingbeil A. et al.Contemporary analysis of charges and mortality in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a cautionary tale.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 1: 61-70Scopus (12) Google Scholar In cases of low contractility, intraventricular stasis, or inadequate anticoagulation, patients are prone to developing intracardiac thrombus. In the largest study to date on rates of thrombus formation during peripheral VA ECMO, of 281 patients in a tertiary care center, 4% had thrombus formation, and in all cases this eventually resulted in in-hospital mortality.2Weber C. Deppe A.C. Sabashnikov A. Slottosch I. Kuhn E. Eghbalzadeh K. et al.Left ventricular thrombus formation in patients undergoing femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Perfusion. 2018; 33: 283-288https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659117745369Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar Herein we present a case and a reproducible technique for quickly removing intracardiac thrombus. The institutional review board or equivalent ethics committee of the University of California San Francisco Medical Center did not approve this study because this is a case report on a single case, and therefore is institutional review board exempt. The patient provided informed written consent for the publication of the study data. A 23-year-old male patient with history of mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacements in India presented in severe cardiogenic shock with massive pulmonary edema. The patient tested positive for COVID-19 and was given femoral VA ECMO. Echocardiogram revealed an ejection fraction of 10% to 15%, thrombosed aortic prosthesis, and severe aortic regurgitation. The patient underwent a redo sternotomy and complex placement of a biological 21-mm Trifecta aortic valve prosthesis (Abbott). Surgery was notable for diffuse adhesions and excessive bleeding; hence a tissue valve was placed. At case end, the patient continued to receive VA ECMO and a left atrial vent (15-French heparin coated cannula) was placed to reduce the pulmonary edema, and offload the left side of the heart. The patient was brought back to the operating room on postoperative day (POD) 2, by which time pulmonary edema had resolved. Despite a heparin drip with activated partial thromboplastin time of 45 to 55, the transesophageal echocardiogram revealed thrombus formation obliterating the left ventricular (LV) cavity (Figure 1). The aorta was crossclamped and large portions of the thrombus were removed with grasping instruments. However, significant thrombus remained in the apex on postoperative echocardiogram; the apex was inaccessible because of poor visualization and the position of the heart with preexisting adhesions. Intracardiac thrombus was subsequently removed under direct vision with a flexible bronchoscope. After a horizontal aortotomy a large single-use flexible bronchoscope (4 Broncho Regular 5.0/2.2; Ambu aScope) was passed beyond the prosthetic aortic valve into the apex of the left ventricle. Using a combination of long, straight grasping instruments, and a toothed biopsy forceps placed through the working canal of the scope, the entire thrombus was removed under vision (Figure 2). Crossclamp time was 79 minutes. Video 1 illustrates ease of retrieval. The patient was decannulated from VA ECMO on POD 13, and discharged to home on POD 41. His ejection fraction improved from 10% to 15% at admission to 65% at discharge. Patients with severely reduced contractility and concomitant stasis in the left ventricle are prone to developing thrombus; in this case a left atrial vent and low levels of anticoagulation in the setting of postoperative bleeding further increased risk of thrombus formation. Thrombus, when it develops in the left ventricle, is approached in 1 of 2 ways—through the left atrium and the mitral valve, or the ventricular wall itself. A transmitral approach was not possible because an existing mechanical prosthesis was in place. The second option via an open ventriculotomy would have negatively affected contractility of an already failing heart. Therefore, the transaortic approach offers value in preserving LV function, but the downside is limited visualization of the entire intracardiac cavity and restricted manipulation using long, straight instruments. The practice of using a videoscope from within a cardiac chamber is termed “cardioscopy.”3Reuthebuch O. Roth M. Skwara W. Klövekorn W.P. Bauer E.P. Cardioscopy: potential applications and benefit in cardiac surgery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 15: 824-829Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar Case reports as early as 1999 describe use of a straight videoscope (5-mm or 10-mm rigid scope).4Tsukube T. Okada M. Ootaki Y. Tsuji Y. Yamashita C. Transaortic video-assisted removal of a left ventricular thrombus.Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 1063-1065https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00662-1Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar,5Eranki A. Villanueva C. Collins N. Seah P. Video assisted, transaortic removal of left ventricular thrombus during concurrent cardiac surgery: a case report.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 16: 242https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01626-4Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar With a redo sternotomy and dense adhesions, rigid instruments were not adequate in this case. A flexible bronchoscope allows 360° rotation, advantageous in a redo setting. Of 36 reports on scope-guided LV mass removal, only 3 report on flexible endoscopes.6Soylu E. Kidher E. Ashrafian H. Stavridis G. Harling L. Athanasiou T. A systematic review of left ventricular cardio-endoscopic surgery.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 12: 41Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar Compared with an endoscope such as that for gastrointestinal procedures, the bronchoscope is less cumbersome and more readily available in a cardiothoracic operating arena. LV thrombus is a known occurrence in patients with poor contractility during ECMO. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines advise use of a plasma-based test (eg, activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-Xa) and whole blood test (eg, activated clotting time, thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastography) to monitor anticoagulation. Thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastography are used as point of care testing to guide blood product administration but testing in ECMO patients for thrombotic events is not yet proven.7McMichael A.B.V. Ryerson L.M. Ratano D. Fan E. Faraoni D. Annich G.M. 2021 ELSO adult and pediatric anticoagulation guidelines.ASAIO J. 2022; 68: 303-310https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001652Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar Regular echocardiogram, improvement in monitoring of anticoagulation,7McMichael A.B.V. Ryerson L.M. Ratano D. Fan E. Faraoni D. Annich G.M. 2021 ELSO adult and pediatric anticoagulation guidelines.ASAIO J. 2022; 68: 303-310https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001652Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar and an efficient method of thrombus removal are of paramount importance. Our experience suggests transaortic removal of LV thrombus with visual guidance from a sterile, flexible bronchoscope, not the typical approach, is reproducible, efficient, and effective. eyJraWQiOiI4ZjUxYWNhY2IzYjhiNjNlNzFlYmIzYWFmYTU5NmZmYyIsImFsZyI6IlJTMjU2In0.eyJzdWIiOiI2NWVlMWZhZTIwMDEyZDBlZTI3YTdmNzZmODA2Y2NhZCIsImtpZCI6IjhmNTFhY2FjYjNiOGI2M2U3MWViYjNhYWZhNTk2ZmZjIiwiZXhwIjoxNjcyMjI4NDk0fQ.h6377dHsjWUoBLgD9qrWHd2OACBnX3ijP4YORgD5ADreQBo4_yijxvkUwwLFZJYmA_AIjeGdiaLGs3Vgk-4tEGnmklE4rSndZmmsHWNNxY4ZQ_zpcizZl_HmNNkcPraJPqFKSEk3-Xag4s1EYvmxzpnPw0iC3a_UpwVG27tYbg6-X370TqHXZX4NiyWcehlCDGsjqt-AQsPblUTOoTiYkIPOuNTuVMPPsvN7jv4QzrZbwnft-O5UpG9RcG1zboKOgTteBREjC4l9f-2QHBJRqlbKStCqZA0bPjHNpPWBlvkNP8RpytqUmTnlUXGlElAS1tsJ2xTMMaIMntxw1zb7Ew Download .mp4 (72.02 MB) Help with .mp4 files Video 1Description of case with intraoperative video. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(22)00445-X/fulltext. Download .jpg (.27 MB) Help with files Video 1Description of case with intraoperative video. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(22)00445-X/fulltext.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,047
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,894

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle