Evaluation of Distance Anatomy Education in the Covid 19 Pandemic: A Survey Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim: The coronavirus disease, which emerged in the last quarter of 2019 in Wuhan, China, spread rapidly and adversely affected our daily lives and the world economy. In order cope with this adverse affect in education, the decision of distance education has been taken in our country and all over the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of medical students on effectiveness of the anatomy practical and theoretical courses given remotely due to the COVID 19 pandemic, and also to determine alternative social media and web-based programs to be used in distance anatomy education.Methods: One hundred and fifty-six students from the 1st and 2nd year of the Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Faculty of Medicine participated in the study. The survey questions were uploaded to the Corporate Education Management and Planning System (KEYPS) and presented to the students to evaluate the effectiveness of practical and theoretical courses in anatomy.Results: While 20 (12.82%) of the participants stated that they did not agree with the proposition "Anatomy lessons are suitable for distance education" for theoretical lessons, and 48 (31.58%) stated that they did not agree with this proposal for practical lessons. On the other hand, the number of students who strongly agreed with this proposal for theoretical and practical sessions were 25 (16.03%) and 14 (9.21%) respectively. A total of 88 students who gave the answer "I strongly disagree or disagree" with the statement "Only using an anatomical model (model) is sufficient in asynchronous anatomy practical lessons", When these students were asked for alternative propositions, 79 (89.77%) of them preferred Digital cadaver applications and 80 (90.90%) preferred 3D Virtual Reality applications.Conclusions: As a result, when we look at the study data, it is seen that giving anatomy practical lessons from a distance is not effective for students, and it may be appropriate to teach theoretical lessons through distance education. However, students prefer social media and web-based programs as alternatives for anatomy theoretical and practical lessons in situations where education should be implemented remotely. In addition, we believe that this deficiency can be eliminated with Digital Cadaver Applications for cadaver education, which has an important place in practical anatomy courses, both in cases like pandemic where education is conducted remotely or in faculties that suffer from shortage of cadavers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».