Magnetic Petrology of Crust- and Mantle-Derived Mesoarchean Ourilândia Granitoids, Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT This paper presents a detailed study of magnetic petrology in crust- and mantle-derived Mesoarchean granitoids (2.92–2.88 Ga) from the Ourilândia do Norte area, which is situated in the midwestern Carajás Mineral Province, southeastern Amazonian Craton (northern Brazil). The textural aspects of opaque minerals and their relation to magnetic susceptibility (MS) were combined with the results of previous works that involve whole-rock geochemistry and mineral chemistry data to discuss the formation conditions and to correlate the MS values and opaque mineral content with the crustal input related to the source of these rocks. The Ourilândia granitoids can be divided into the following three lithological associations: (1) potassic granites represented by biotite monzogranites and high-Ti granodiorites, which both host tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) affinity tonalitic xenoliths; (2) sanukitoids formed by granodiorites (equi- to heterogranular and porphyritic), with minor occurrences of tonalite, quartz monzodiorite, quartz diorite, and mafic microgranular enclaves; and (3) TTG-affinity porphyritic trondhjemite, which is represented by a small, slightly deformed stock. The cumulative frequency curve from the MS data defines three main magnetic populations as follows: (1) population A is characterized by low MS values (0.05 × 10–3 to 0.59 × 10–3 SI) formed by sanukitoid and trondhjemite rocks, which contain rare opaque minerals; (2) population B is defined by moderate MS values (0.70 × 10–3 to 1.24 × 10–3 SI) wherein sanukitoids predominate over the potassic granites while ilmenite prevails in relation to magnetite; (3) population C is represented by high MS values (1.33 × 10–3 to 17.0 × 10–3 SI) in which potassic granites and high-Ti granodiorites are predominant, in addition to the porphyritic and heterogranular sanukitoids. The Fe/(Fe + Mg) ratios in whole rock, biotite, and amphibole indicate high redox conditions for the sanukitoids and potassic granites, which are mostly above the nickel-nickel oxide (NNO) buffer (+0.5 < NNO < +1.9) and at or slightly below the NNO for the TTG-affinity trondhjemite (–0.5 < NNO < +1.0). The variation in the opaque mineral content (especially magnetite) explains in the first instance the magnetic behavior of these rocks. Furthermore, our results not only suggest that the oxidation states recorded in these granitoids are associated with the nature of their sources, but also suggest that unlike the depleted mantle (reduced in nature), the continental crust (monzogranite source) and subcontinental lithospheric mantle (the source of the sanukitoids and high-Ti granodiorite) are oxidized, while the oceanic crust (trondhjemite source) is moderately oxidized. The low MS values and the scarcity of magnetite reported for the equigranular sanukitoids and trondhjemite can be attributed to the variations in crustal input (crustal anatexis and/or mantle enrichment) in magmas that can change the overall fO2 and thereby promote differences in the Fe-Ti oxide mineral assemblage. The frequent presence of magnetite and high MS in the porphyritic sanukitoid reinforces the differences in the enrichment degree of their source in relation to other sanukitoids. The Ourilândia granitoids provided temperatures between 959 and 738 °C, with a higher water content in the sanukitoids (>5%) than in the potassic granites (<4%) and TTG-affinity granitoids (<4%). Except for the TTG-affinity trondhjemite, which returned higher emplacement depths (580–263 MPa), the studied granitoids were emplaced under high redox conditions in the upper crust (297–80 MPa). The textural aspects of the Fe-Ti oxide minerals suggest cooling temperatures of 620 to 550 °C, as indicated by the subsolidus textures in magnetite and ilmenite (trellis ilmenite, external and internal composite ilmenite lamellae, and titanite to ilmenite and pyrite to goethite replacement) in the tardi- to postmagmatic stages.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».