Incorporation of trauma-informed practice principles by nurse practitioners into telemental health care provision
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A trauma-informed approach to care incorporates awareness of the how trauma, a highly prevalent experience, impacts multiple aspects of health and influences an individual’s experience of health care. Nurse practitioners working within the primary care context frequently care for complex patients with a high burden of trauma and negative past experiences with the healthcare system. It is essential that nurse practitioners are equipped to provide care that is trauma-informed, regardless of its mode of delivery. Though some trauma-informed care guidelines are available, no specific guideline is available to guide its application specific to telemental health care. Therefore, the goal of this project was to explore how nurse practitioners can incorporate the principles of trauma-informed care into their provision of telemental health care. An integrative literature review was conducted, using the framework of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services’ model of trauma-informed care to guide keyword selection. The initial search yielded 1028 results; after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 15 articles were included in the review. Data relevant to the research question was extracted and collated, and the following areas were summarized: how trauma was conceptualized, how telemental health care was delivered and integrated into larger systems of care, and how each of the assumptions and principles of trauma-informed practice were demonstrated. From these findings, intrinsic characteristics of telemental health care were identified, and a model of trauma-informed telemental health care specific to the scope and context of family nurse practitioners in primary care. Recommendations for practice were made based on how nurse practitioners can capitalize on those characteristics of telemental health care that align with a trauma informed approach, including the option to avoid entering unsafe physical health care spaces, reduction of number of people in the room during vulnerable procedures, inclusion of family, friends, and community, adaptability to patient needs and preferences, access to a more diverse selection of services, and convenience. Further recommendations for practice were made to guide nurse practitioners in mitigating the risks associated with those characteristics of telemental health care that challenge the provision of trauma-informed care, including physical separation from the patient, need for patients to place an additional layer of trust in providers to take appropriate security precautions, loss of a private space provided by in-person appointments, risk of triggering and recreating traumatic experiences that involved technology, and inaccessibility of services based on their technology-related knowledge and material requirements. Finally, recommendations were made for how policy and research can address gaps in knowledge and actions required that fall beyond the scope of individual practitioners. This review suggests that while nurse practitioners cannot use telehealth as the sole vehicle through which they offer their patients trauma-informed mental health care, the principles of trauma-informed care can be incorporated into telemental health care in ways that enhance the nurse practitioner’s ability to avoid retriggering trauma, support the establishment of trust in patient-provider relationships, and take steps towards overcoming trauma-related health inequity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,099 | 0,131 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,018 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».