Rockfall detection using LiDAR and deep learning
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rockfall risk management has traditionally been built upon scenarios based on statistical analysis of historic frequency-magnitude rockfall patterns which allows for an estimation of the return period of rockfalls within given ranges of magnitude. Τhe availability of rockfall databases is thereby of crucial importance to quantify rockfall activity. In recent years, engineering geologists have been able to leverage light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology with automated change detection and clustering workflows, for spatially accurate rockfall monitoring and inventorization. This wealth of digital data generates new research prospects for the development of an artificial intelligence (AI) system able to analyze change detection sequences and map spatio-temporal rockfall patterns by precisely capturing the rock slope evolution in near-real-time. However, prerequisite to such an advancement is the need to efficiently automate the process of classifying surface changes corresponding to rockfall. This task typically requires intensive human effort and is prone to multiple sources of human error like subjectivity, expertise, and experience that may differ from person to person involved in a particular project. This paper investigates the potential of integrating sophisticated deep learning architectures into dynamic rockfall database population processes, with the goal of relieving experts from the daunting task of manually classifying rockfall events within large loads of change detection data. Deep neural networks based on the pioneering PointNet and PointNet++ architectures for 3D point cloud learning are developed for this purpose based on a 5-year change detection database consisting of >8000 rock slope clusters of identified change for training, with scanning intervals ranging from 5 days to 6 months. The models are tested on the 536 clusters from the two last data acquisitions to simulate the real monitoring situation and subsequently on the most frequent of the campaigns to increase the probability of working with single-event clusters. The best-performing model achieves an accuracy of about 89% and 84% on the last and shortest campaign, respectively. The optimized deep learning models are further evaluated on a geologically different rockfall database achieving almost 93% accuracy in a location where discrete geomorphologic features such as steep rock outcrops and erosion channels are present. The study shows that although it is challenging to achieve generalization in rockfall detection, site-specific training of the proposed deep learning architecture can lead to high-level performance and support further advancements in rockfall risk management.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle