A proof of principle study investigating the effects of supplemental concentrated brewer’s yeast on markers of gut permeability, inflammation, and fecal metabolites in healthy non-challenged adult sled dogs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Yeast-derived β-glucans impact immunity, though their effects on gut permeability and inflammation are less understood. Most research has investigated other components of the yeast cell wall, such as the prebiotic mannan- and fructo-oligosaccharides. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of feeding a concentrated yeast product on markers of inflammation (serum amyloid A [SAA] and haptoglobin [Hp]) and oxidative status (malondialdehyde [MDA]), fecal products of fermentation, and gut permeability. Nineteen privately owned domestic Siberian huskies, and one Alaskan husky (9 females: 5 intact, 4 spayed; 11 males: 3 intact, 8 neutered), with an average age of 4.8 ± 2.6 yr and body weight (BW) of 25.6 ± 4.1 kg, were used in this study. Dogs were blocked and randomly allocated to one of two diet groups. Ten dogs received a dry extruded diet. The other 10 received the same diet top dressed with yeast for a daily β-glucan dose of 7 mg/kg BW for 10 wk. Fecal collection, for evaluation of fecal metabolites, and scoring occurred weekly. Gut permeability was assessed using the chromium-labeled ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (Cr-EDTA) and iohexol markers prior to the initiation of dietary treatment and after 10 wk of treatment. Blood samples were collected premarker administration and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h postadministration. Fasting concentrations of SAA, Hp, and MDA were measured on weeks -1, 2, 4, and 8. Incremental area under the curve (I-AUC) was calculated for serum iohexol and Cr-EDTA concentrations. All data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS with dog as random effect, and week as fixed effect and repeated measure. Dogs receiving treatment tended to have decreased I-AUC of Iohexol (P = 0.10) and Cr-EDTA (P = 0.06) between baseline and cessation of treatment compared to the change over time in I-AUC for control (Ctl) dogs. Treatment dogs had lower Hp concentrations (P ≤ 0.05) than Ctl. There were no differences between treatments for SAA and MDA concentrations (P > 0.05). Fecal arabinose concentrations were greater in treatment (Trt) dogs (P ≤ 0.05) compared to Ctl, though no other fecal metabolites were affected by treatment. There was no difference in the relative frequency of defecations scored at any fecal score between Trt and Ctl dogs, and mean score did not differ between groups (P > 0.10). These data suggest that concentrated brewer's yeast may have the potential to reduce gut permeability without impacting inflammatory status and markers of health in adult dogs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».