Association between transfer of passive immunity and health disorders in multisource commingled dairy calves raised for veal or other purposes: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Inadequate transfer of passive immunity (ITPI) in newborn dairy calves remains an important risk factor for mortality and morbidity. Most available studies are focused on calves delivered and raised on the same farms. This setting is far different from calves transported and commingled from different farms to be raised as veal or for other purposes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe the association between ITPI and important health outcomes (mortality, bovine respiratory disease, and diarrhea) in multisource commingled dairy calves raised for veal or other purposes. We searched studies through CAB abstracts (via CAB direct), PubMed, and Web of Science (via ISI) databases until September 2, 2021. Observational studies and randomized trials written in English or French assessing ITPI association with any of the selected outcomes were included. Young dairy calves transported to commercial facilities and explicitly stated as being raised for veal production or not (then considered as "other") were our populations of interest. If raw or adjusted data were available for ≥5 studies for a given outcome of interest, then random effect meta-analysis models were used to investigate ITPI effects on this outcome. Nineteen studies were selected from 6,221 abstracts retrieved in the initial search. We observed significantly higher odds of mortality in calves with ITPI compared with those with successful transfer of passive immunity [odds ratio (OR) = 2.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-4.22, n = 8 studies]. Calves with ITPI had higher odds of diarrhea (OR = 3.03; 95% CI: 1.2-7.62, n = 7 studies). A significant publication bias toward publishing studies with positive results was found in studies reporting on bovine respiratory disease (n = 5 studies), which revealed nonsignificant associations after correction of publication bias (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 0.77-2.6). Heterogeneity could not be thoroughly investigated for mortality and diarrhea due to the limited number of studies. Therefore, the pooled estimates of the random models should be interpreted with caution despite their robustness to sensitivity analyses. In this study, we also observed that multiple definitions for transfer of passive immunity and outcomes were used in the literature. Moreover, the raising system definition was often limited. There seems, therefore, to be a need for standardized definitions of these parameters, as well as a better description of systems used for multisource commingled dairy calves raised for veal production or other production purposes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,019 | 0,035 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».