MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4294162901 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.5087

Judith Lynn Pipher

2022· article· en· W4294162901 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy Mainzer, Craig W. McMurtry

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyPhysicsAstronomyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The “mother of infrared astronomy,” Judith Lynn Pipher, passed away in her hometown of Seneca Falls, New York, on 21 February 2022 from pancreatic cancer.Judith Lynn PipherNASA/COURTESY OF AIP ESVA/ERICKSON COLLECTIONPPT|High resolutionBorn on 18 June 1940 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Judy received her BS in physics and astronomy from the University of Toronto in 1962 and her PhD in astronomy from Cornell University in 1971. She wrote her thesis, “Rocket submillimeter observations of the galaxy and background,” with Martin Harwit as her adviser. Judy became a faculty member in the physics and astronomy department at the University of Rochester in 1971.Judy taught countless students at Rochester. Numerous undergraduates received their educational foundation from her, while many graduate students achieved their PhDs under her helpful, thoughtful, and inspiring tutelage. Judy instilled within all of her students and coworkers a desire to achieve more. She inspired colleagues and served as a powerful mentor and guide to many scientists throughout their careers.Over the course of Judy’s academic career, she was an author on numerous papers covering various topics relevant to IR astrophysics. Her early contributions to the field included measurements of the galactic background and measurements of reddening—that is, extinction due to dust along the line of sight—for planetary nebulae and star-formation regions.A pioneer in IR instrumentation, Judy, along with James Houck, designed a black paint that had three-dimensional structure, which made it suitable as an absorber for far-IR wavelengths. Judy built and operated a lamellar grating spectrometer for the far-IR that was then used on the Kuiper Airborne Observatory. With fellow Rochester astronomer Stewart Sharpless, Judy studied many H II regions, most of which were originally cataloged by Sharpless, including S106, a particularly spectacular bipolar H II region that has been a target of virtually all ground- and space-based IR observatories since. Much of Judy’s career was spent using photometric and spectroscopic IR data to study and understand star-formation regions in the Milky Way and in starburst galaxies such as Messier 82.In 1982, with the acquisition of an indium antimonide CCD, Judy and William Forrest, also at Rochester, were able to produce the first direct images of Saturn, Jupiter, and the Moon. (Previous images were assembled using raster scans from single-pixel detectors.) That enormous step forward for IR astronomy helped to propel the development of the Spitzer Space Telescope—originally called the Space Infrared Telescope Facility—which was launched in 2003 and decommissioned in 2020. It used a later version of the IR detector arrays, based on a 256 × 256 InSb array hybridized to a CMOS readout. Judy and Forrest’s development of IR detector arrays facilitated IR instruments used by astronomers around the world to produce many thousands of journal articles over the past four decades, and it revolutionized both ground- and space-based IR astronomy in the process.In the mid 1990s, Judy and Forrest continued to develop new detector technologies, specifically long-wavelength-cutoff mercury cadmium telluride arrays. Those arrays targeted wavelengths out to 10 μm instead of the more traditional 2.5 μm cutoffs of the arrays in use at the time. The goal was similar to their effort in the 1980s—to produce detector arrays that could be used with astronomical space telescopes. By 2013 the effort was a success and the arrays were proposed for use in the Near-Earth Object Surveyor (formerly the Near-Earth Object Camera). The long-wavelength HgCdTe arrays have been matured into a 20482 format with low noise, low dark current, and high quantum efficiency suitable for space-based astronomy. Still longer-wavelength versions extending out to about 15 μm have been produced.Judy’s broader impacts on the community are widely felt. Not only was she one of the original trailblazers in using array technology for IR astronomy, but she was one of a very small handful of women doing hands-on laboratory research in the area. That earned her the nickname the “mother of infrared astronomy.” She served as an editor of the Astrophysical Journal, and the asteroid 306128 Pipher is named in her honor.Judy was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame in Seneca Falls in 2007 and helped to recognize the achievements of women across a broad array of disciplines when she subsequently joined the hall’s board of directors. In addition, she served as a board member of the Cayuga Lake Watershed Network, an organization devoted to protecting critical natural resources, and of the Seneca Museum of Waterways and Industry, home of the Seneca Falls Visitor Center.Judy was a pillar of the science community both personally and professionally. Her strength, intellect, courage, and kindness sustained us both through difficult times and continue to inspire us. Not only did Judy give us fabulous new views of the universe through her scientific work, she helped us see with clarity and humanity.© 2022 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,318
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,413

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,182
Écart entre enseignants0,173 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationTravaux en français237 207