Antibody-Based Proteomics Analysis of Tumor Cell Signaling Pathways
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The promise of personalized medicine is ultimately contingent on the successful identification of specific biomarkers for diseases and therapeutic modalities that can compensate for the molecular lesions that underlie these diseases. In the case of cancer, more than two decades of research have demonstrated the critical roles of a relatively small subset of proteins that are encoded by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The gain of function of perhaps just a few oncoproteins and the loss of function of only a small number of tumor suppressor proteins in the right combinations may culminate in full neoplastic transformation. However, there may well be billions of such genetic change combinations so that every cancer patient has a unique form of the disease. Presently, just under half of cancer patients die from their disease within 5 years so there is a pressing need for development of new diagnostics and treatments. Like many chronic diseases associated with aging, cancer is a systems disorder. Most of the known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes specify protein kinases, their regulators, or their target substrates. The human genome encodes at least 515 protein kinases (the kineome) [1, 2] and 140 protein phosphatases [3], which catalyze the reversible phosphorylation of over a third of all proteins at more than 1,000,000 sites (the phosphoproteome) [4]. Many of these phosphorylation events play key roles in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival. The phosphoproteome represents a relatively untapped source of potential biomarkers, and phosphoproteomics profiling should be extremely insightful for analysis of signaling pathways [5]. Our current knowledge of the composition and architecture of cell signaling systems is still extremely rudimentary. To elucidate these molecular communications webs, specific information is required concerning the spatial and temporal expression and activity of thousands of individual proteins in the nearly 200 different cell types in the organs and tissues of the human body. One of the major challenges of this decade will be the elucidation of these regulatory networks and the development of technologies to track their protein components in tumor biopsies and bodily fluids for cancer diagnostics. Although cancer is commonly viewed as a genetics disease, its successful treatment will require the knowledge of malfunctioning signal transduction at the protein level and the application of small molecule drugs. A very powerful arsenal of protein kinase inhibitors is being developed by the pharmaceutical industry, which is now spending about a third of their annual research and development budgets on this class of enzymes [6]. We predict that within the next 10 years, most of the new drugs in clinical trials and entering the market place will be protein kinase inhibitors. One reason for this is because the industry is currently focused on only a few dozen of the protein kinases, and over 90% of them still remain to be explored for their therapeutic potential [4]. Another impetus is that over 400 other diseases have been linked to defective kinase signaling. Consequently, there will be an increasing demand to track signal transduction proteins in the near future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».