Open elbow dislocation with no osseous injury associated with median nerve transection
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Open elbow dislocation is a rare injury that is commonly associated with periarticular fractures, severe soft tissue damage, and neurovascular injury. Limited literature is available on the management and outcomes of this injury. Significant post-traumatic morbidity, stiffness, and chronic instability at the elbow joint are potential outcomes that orthopedic surgeons aim to avoid. To our knowledge, we present the first case report of a non-fracture open elbow dislocation associated with median nerve transection in a 14-year-old male. A previously healthy, left-hand dominant, 14-year-old male presented to a general hospital via ambulance after being involved in an all-terrain vehicle accident. At a high speed, the all-terrain vehicle had flipped over and landed on the patient’s extended arm. The patient initially presented with severe pain and a large open wound. A primary survey did not reveal any remarkable findings. A secondary survey revealed a transverse 10cm wound over the left antecubital region and gross deformity of the elbow suggestive of a posterior elbow dislocation as the distal humerus was visible through the wound. Initial management included reduction, removal of gross debris, preliminary closure of the wound, and immobilization in an above elbow slab. A neurovascular examination revealed complete motor and sensory deficits in the distribution of the median nerve. Both the radial and ulnar pulses were easily palpable. Radiographs were obtained revealing a reduced elbow joint with no associated fractures. The patient received triple antibiotics (cefazolin, clindamycin, and metronidazole) and was subsequently referred to our tertiary orthopedic hospital. The patient was admitted and transferred to the operating room for exploration, irrigation, and operative fixation. Intraoperative assessment revealed an unstable elbow, dislocating at 80 degrees of flexion. The brachial artery was intact; however, the median nerve was completely transected with visible bruising on both ends. The distal humerus was devoid of any soft tissue attachments. The flexor pronator mass, medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and the anterior capsule were completely torn (Fig. 1). Both the triceps and biceps were intact and attached to the olecranon and radial tuberosity, respectively. The brachialis was completely avulsed from the coronoid process. After thorough irrigation with normal saline, the ulnohumeral joint was reduced and the wound was extended proximally and distally in a z-fashion. A separate posteriolateral Kocher approach was performed. Medially, the MCL and the flexor mass were repaired using double-loaded all-suture anchors on the medial epicondyle. Laterally, the LCL and common extensor origin were repaired using a double-loaded knotless suture anchor on the lateral epicondyle. Good varus and valgus stability were achieved, and the elbow was stable in the tested range of 20-120. Further range was avoided to protect the repair. An external fixator was applied and good alignment was achieved (Fig. 2). The anterior capsule was repaired using Vicryl no.1. After trimming the bruised edges, the median nerve was repaired using 5-0 and 6-0 synthetic nonabsorbable monofilament sutures (Prolene) and nerve glue. The external fixator was applied at 90 flexion for a tension-free median nerve repair. The patient did not have any immediate or early postoperative complications and the wound healed uneventfully. The patient was discharged with oral analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories. Follow-up was scheduled regularly; at one month postoperative, initial improvements were seen with regards to median nerve motor and sensory innervation. The external fixator was removed at 2 months postoperatively. Immediate flexion-extension arc after the removal was 80 – 90 degrees. Manipulation under anesthesia achieved an arc of 15-135. Progressive improvement until 18 months postoperative was evident and the final arc of flexion-extension was 22 – 136 degrees. Further, the pronation-supination arc was 75 – 95 degrees (Fig. 3). At 18 months postoperative, the power was 4+ (Fig. 4), however, some mild reduction in sensation to fine touch was present. The calculated American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 92 at his final follow-up. Heterotopic ossification was evident over MCL and LCL on plain radiographs. Although there was considerable ossification present, this was asymptomatic (Fig. 5).Figure 4A picture at 18 months follow-up showing the patient opposing his thumb of the affected side.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Figure 5A plain radiograph at 18 months follow-up showing radiologically significant heterotopic ossification around the elbow. (A) AP view, (B) lateral view, and (C) oblique view.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The elbow is the most commonly dislocated major joint in pediatrics, and second only to the shoulder in adults.1Hildebrand K. Patterson S. King G. Acute elbow dislocations.Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 63-79Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar,2Kuhn M.A. Ross G. Acute elbow dislocations.Orthop Clin North Am. 2008 Apr; 39 (v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2007.12.004): 155-161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (90) Google Scholar Elbow dislocation is often classified into simple and complex dislocations, in which the latter is associated with periarticular fractures, whereas the former is limited to soft tissue injuries.1Hildebrand K. Patterson S. King G. Acute elbow dislocations.Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 63-79Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar Most simple elbow dislocations are treated nonoperatively and possess favorable outcomes, with only about 2.3% of such cases requiring surgical stabilization within a year.4Modi C.S. Wasserstein D. Mayne I.P. Henry P.D. Mahomed N. Veillette C.J. The frequency and risk factors for subsequent surgery after a simple elbow dislocation.Injury. 2015; 46: 1156-1160https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar The extent of soft tissue injury is usually predictive of the elbow instability after reduction is performed.6Robinson P. Griffiths E. Watts A. Simple elbow dislocation.Shoulder Elbow. 2017; 9: 195-204https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217694163Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Examination under anesthesia can be utilized to assess postreduction stability, and aid selection of patients that would likely benefit from early operative stabilization.6Robinson P. Griffiths E. Watts A. Simple elbow dislocation.Shoulder Elbow. 2017; 9: 195-204https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217694163Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar,7Schnetzke M. Aytac S. Studier-Fischer S. Grützner P.A. Guehring T. Initial joint stability affects the outcome after conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocations: a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 128https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0273-xCrossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar An unstable elbow at 30 flexion or higher often suggests that surgical repair is more favorable.5O'Driscoll S.W. Jupiter J.B. King G.J. Hotchkiss R.N. Morrey B.F. The unstable elbow.Instr Course Lect. 2001; 50: 89-102PubMed Google Scholar There are limited data in the current literature on the optimal management, outcomes, and natural progression of similar cases.8Schnetzke M. Porschke F. Kneser U. Studier-Fischer S. Grützner P. Guehring T. Functional outcomes and complications of open elbow dislocations.Obere Extremität. 2018; 13: 204-210https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0466-0Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar Further, the combination of various associated injuries makes it difficult to anticipate outcomes. The rarity of our case stems from the age of the patient, the open elbow dislocation, the absence of fractures, and the transection of the median nerve. Predicting outcomes and counseling the patient and their families may prove challenging, and providers may benefit from establishing realistic expectations, especially in the setting of a median nerve transection.3Lari A. Alherz M. Jarragh A. Dissociating advances in orthopaedic trauma management from the climbing patient expectations.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr; 48: 1487https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01705-0Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar The elbow is prone to heterotropic ossification after dislocation. The severity of trauma and tissue damage correlates with the risk of heterotopic ossification development.9Summerfield S. DiGiovanni C. Weiss A. Heterotopic ossification of the elbow.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997; 6: 321-332Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar Despite receiving prophylactic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, our patient developed significant heterotropic ossification as was clearly visible on postoperative radiographs. However, the clinical outcomes suggest that this was asymptomatic and thus was only followed up. In our case, we report satisfactory outcomes in the early repair of this injury. The functional range of motion was restored and the median nerve had almost completely recovered. Early treatment coupled with intensive physiotherapy may optimize outcomes in similar cases. Funding: No funding was disclosed by the authors. Conflicts of interest: The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. Patient consent: Obtained.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».