MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4295073585 · doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.07.006

Crowdfunding approach for gene therapy: Experience from the UAE

2022· article· en· W4295073585 sur OpenAlex
Afnan Elbashir, Ahmed Nugud, Haitham Elbashir

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatrics & Neonatology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSpinal muscular atrophySMA*SMN1DiseaseAtrophyPediatricsInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive neurological disease characterized by severe muscle weakness caused by losing spinal motor neurons.1Scano A. Chiavenna A. Malosio M. Molinari Tosatti L. Kinect V2 performance assessment in daily-life gestures: cohort study on healthy subjects for a reference database for automated instrumental evaluations on neurological patients.Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017; 2017: 8567084Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar It is a rare genetic disease with around 1 in 10,000 incidence rate and is caused by a deletion of the SMN1 gene.2Kolb S.J. Kissel J.T. Spinal muscular atrophy: a timely review.Arch Neurol. 2011; 68: 979-984Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar Three medications have been approved for the treatment of SMA in the past 5 years, including gene therapy (onasemnogene abeparvovec), also known as Zolgensma, which changed the landscape of the disease as it targets the root cause of the illness by transferring the missing gene into human cells.3Mahajan R. Onasemnogene abeparvovec for spinal muscular atrophy: the costlier drug ever.Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019; 9: 127-128Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Since its approval in 2019, only over a thousand patients worldwide have received Zolgensma despite its proven efficacy and safety and convenience as it is given only given once in life. Its high price, $2.125 million, puts it out of reach for the majority of patients, insurance companies, and countries, is a significant limiting factor for its use clinically.3Mahajan R. Onasemnogene abeparvovec for spinal muscular atrophy: the costlier drug ever.Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019; 9: 127-128Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Some of our patients used an exciting approach called crowdfunding to pay for the expensive treatment cost and get the therapy. Crowdfunding is not a novel idea; it has been employed for years to raise money from the general public to fund projects.4Borst I. Moser C. Ferguson J. From friendfunding to crowdfunding: relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance.New Media Soc. 2018; 20: 1396-1414Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar There have been early reports that Joseph Pulitzer crowdfunded a pedestal for the Statue of Liberty via the Pulitzer newspaper. In the digital era, crowdfunding has moved to online platforms, and its effect has been augmented by the influence social media has on our daily lives. Different types of crowdfunding exist; in donation crowdfunding, funders usually support a charity project without the expectation of a monetary compensation, rather recognition in other forms is expected. A good example of this is JustGiving website. While medical crowdfunding, in particular, has been used in public health campaigns like vaccine developments, another growing area of medical crowdfunding is for treatment, either for expensive medical bills or sponsor medical treatment; these include GoFundMe, YouCaring, and many other US-based companies,4Borst I. Moser C. Ferguson J. From friendfunding to crowdfunding: relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance.New Media Soc. 2018; 20: 1396-1414Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar with reports of an increasing number of cases registered annually in the US.4Borst I. Moser C. Ferguson J. From friendfunding to crowdfunding: relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance.New Media Soc. 2018; 20: 1396-1414Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar Families of patients in our center afforded this expensive treatment via online crowdfunding during the hajj piligrimage and the holy month of Ramadan. During the holy times, families managed to gather an average of 80%–90% of the total required for the therapy. Families used social media and “hashtag campaigns” to promote their case, with some families using online streaming and online live chat to highlight their child's challenges. Only 2 of the 30 patients in our cohort had insurance coverage for their treatment, while four patients used social media to build support for their cause and end up with the treatment being covered by a celebrity or a member of the royal family. The rest of our cohort had the treatment covered via crowdfunding. According to Bassani et al., there are 76 online medical crowdfunding platforms active worldwide, with an estimated gross of $132 million annually.5Bassani G. Marinelli N. Vismara S. Crowdfunding in healthcare.J Technol Transf. 2019; 44: 1290-1310Crossref Scopus (41) Google Scholar Most of the reports come from the US, mostly due to individual financial difficulties brought on by steadily increasing medical bills. Interestingly, there has been an increasing report of crowdfunding cases from countries with universal healthcare system. For instance, Lublóy et al., cited the lengthy legislative process to emerging therapeutics and the increasing demand for high-quality medical care as a reason for crowdfunding in Europe, which, broadly speaking, is a universal healthcare system with variability among its member countries.6Lublóy Á Medical crowdfunding in a healthcare system with universal coverage: an exploratory study.BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 1672Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar Crowdfunding is a viable alternative to conventional borrowing and, in theory, accessible to everyone, private individuals as well as economic entities.7Belleflamme P. Lambert T. Schwienbacher A. Individual crowdfunding practices.Ventur Cap. 2013; 15: 313-333Crossref Scopus (273) Google Scholar Due to the decentralized structure of the crowdfunding industry, determining its size is difficult. It is estimated that health care initiatives had earned more than $132 million by October 2017. By comparison, medical-crowdfunding campaigns on GoFundMe reach a significantly wider audience. By 2018, GoFundMe has collected over $650 million globally for medical causes by 250,000 campaigns. Crowdfunded expensive gene therapy meets a negligible proportion of medical and health-related requirements that remain unmet. By and large, crowdfunding campaigns are initiated by younger individuals with more advanced computer knowledge. Berliner and Kenworthy claim that crowdfunding campaigns are often started by individuals with exceptional reading and writing skills. Health, social media, and technological literacy are all necessary. Furthermore, Snyder et al., claim that crowdfunding is popular among relatively affluent people of society, such as those who are technologically savvy and have extensive social networks.8Snyder J. Crooks V.A. Mathers A. Chow-White P. Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns.J Med Ethics. 2017; 43: 364-367Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar Indeed, big social networks contribute significantly to fundraising success; promoting initiatives through social media platforms enhances the likelihood of success. Crowdfunding for expensive genetic treatment is a relatively new but quickly increasing phenomenon in which individuals (co-)finance their health care expenses via numerous individuals making (very modest) contributions.9Coutrot I.P. Smith R. Cornelsen L. Is the rise of crowdfunding for medical expenses in the United Kingdom symptomatic of systemic gaps in health and social care?.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020; 25: 181-186Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar The popular crowdsourcing site, GoFundMe, has projects for various medical (and social) needs for patients. Medical crowdfunding's individual and systemic effects are slowly appearing, primarily in the US and Canada. According to Saleh et al., crowdfunding for expensive genetic therapy was initially hailed as a form of digital insurance.10Saleh S.N. Ajufo E. Lehmann C.U. Medford R.J. A comparison of online medical crowdfunding in Canada, the UK, and the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e2021684Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Alternatively, democratizing philanthropy can be accomplished by making it accessible to everyone. Factors influencing crowdfunding success, include recipient demographic, treatment kind, campaigning nation, the campaign's fundraising target, the number of contributors, and the duration of the campaign narrative. Setting a more significant objective for expensive genetic therapy campaigns, according to Snyder et al., may help contributors understand their needs and promote the idea of deservingness. The length of the campaign story underscores the critical nature of the disease narrative to fundraising success. The market for crowdfunded expensive gene therapy is substantial and rapidly expanding with new genetic therapies on the horizon, for example, for Duchane muscular dystrophy, crowdfunding will become more streamlined, especially if insurer policies that do not cover genetic conditions continue. The legislative issue with crowdfunding is challenging, with no right or wrong answer, and no answer that fits all, especially that the fudging is often from international sources as well as national sources. Thus, the process of setting in laws that govern this transaction should be implemented by all stakeholders, including the media that the process occurs through, not only the governmental institutions. As the market expands, proper legislation should be enacted to support crowdfunding in medical diseases. Currently, the process is decentralized and is dependent on collaborative effort. The authors have no conflict of interest. The following is the Supplementary data to this article: Download .docx (.02 MB) Help with docx files Multimedia component 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,871
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,890

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle