A Comparative Study to Assess the Perceived Stress of Mothers who have Undergone Caesarean Section and Normal Delivery at St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Child birth is a universally celebrated event an occasion for dancing fireworks flowers and gifts. It is a joyous event at the same time it is a time of pain fear and stress. Every woman feels that being a mother is the most gifted position through her life time. Pregnancy is a crisis in the human life and it is an important turning point of anatomical physiological and psychological changes in womens life. Stress is a part of human life and we are never completely free from it. All women in labour experience varieties of stress irrespective of their mode of delivery. Emergency caesarean section may cause more emotional stress to the women than normal delivery. Primi gravida mothers are more likely to face emotional stress because it cause the beginning of major life change to the women. Even for the most recognized mothers pain reduce the ability to cope and may make her short tempered and quick to criticize things around her.Researchers found that certain variables can influence labour stress such as nalliparity low level of formal education absence of antenatal education and unexpected pregnancy. Thus it reveals that all women in labour experience stress. Finding from review of literature personal experiences of the investigator and discussion with experts have motivated the investigator to take up a study to compare the perceived stress of mothers who have undergone caesarean section and normal delivery.Objectives of the studybull To assess the perceived stress of mothers who have undergone caesarean section and normal delivery.bull To compare the perceived stress of mothers who have undergone caesarean section with normal delivery.bull To determine the relationship between perceived stresses of mothers who have undergone caesarean section and selected base line variables.bull To determine the relationship between the perceived stress of mothers with normal delivery and selected base line variables.Methods The research design selected for the study was comparative descriptive research. The setting selected was Obstetric ward of SJMCH Bangalore. The 100 mothers who have undergone caesarean section 50 and normal delivery 50 at SJMCH within 24- 48 hours of child birth were selected for the study by purposive sampling technique. Modified ldquoPerceived Stress Scalerdquo was used to assess the perceived stress of mothers with caesarean section and normal delivery. The data was analyzed in terms of objectives of the study using descriptive and inferential statistics.Results The findings of the study show that mothers with LSCS experienced more stress than mothers with vaginal delivery with a total mean score of 118.06plusmn19.91 and 108.8plusmn19.17 respectively and it shows significant difference between stress among mothers with LSCS and FTND at Plt0.05 level of significance. Mothers with caesarean section experienced more emotional stress with mean score of 64.86 than the mothers with normal delivery with the mean score of 56.4. The mean score of physical stress of mothers with LSCS is 40.98 and mothers with FTND is 42.28. The mothers with LSCS and FTND had experienced financial stress with the mean score of 12.22 and 10.12 respectively. There is a significant difference in financial stress of mothers with caesarean section and normal delivery at P lt .050.033 level of significances and emotional stress at P .001 level.Conclusion The finding of the study clearly point out that the perceived stress level among mothers with caesarean section and normal delivery differ. Caesarean section mothers experienced more emotional stress and financial stress than mothers with normal delivery. Mothers from both group experienced almost equal amount of physical stress. It reveal that every mother is going through some amount of stress irrespective of mode of delivery and it is our duty to provide maximum support during the labor process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».