Abstract A009: Proteogenomic prioritization of immunotherapeutic targets in rhabdomyosarcoma nominate MEGF10 for preclinical development
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has a high unmet need in terms of precision therapy development as there are currently no approved immunotherapies or targeted therapies, and few in the developmental pipeline. Here we sought to identify cell surface oncoproteins as a target for novel RMS-directed immunotherapies. Methods: We first performed plasma membrane enrichment followed by mass spectrometry to define the cell surface landscape of 7 fusion(+) and 14 fusion(-) RMS patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. The surfaceome data was filtered to only “high confidence” surface proteins by querying protein localization databases, Compartments (https://compartments.jensenlab.org/) and CIRFESS (https://gundrylab.shinyapps.io/cirfess/). We then developed a prioritization algorithm that uses a rank-product approach to score surface proteins. The input to the algorithm is a matrix that integrates multiple datasets to score the surface proteins based on their suitability to be an optimal immunotherapeutic target. In addition to the surfaceome data generated here, we also integrated matched RNA-sequencing data from eleven of the RMS PDX models, RNA-sequencing data from GTEx (n=15,253) and a recently developed normal tissue proteomics dataset (n=201) [Jiang. Cell. 2020], a list from Gene Ontology that included genes involved in muscle development pathways, and the gene dependency list for RMS in DepMap (https://depmap.org/portal/). Results: A total of 913 and 937 high confidence surface proteins were annotated from the mass spectrometry data for fusion(+) and fusion(−) samples, respectively. A dendrogram separated the surface protein profiles into two clusters based on fusion(+) and fusion(−) RMS subtypes, thus the algorithm was run separately on each subtype. Within the top 50% of prioritized targets, 88% and 86% of the targets overlapped and 12% and 14% were identified exclusively in fusion(+) and fusion(−) subtypes, respectively. ALK, a previously putative protein marker in fusion(+) RMS, scored in the top 10% of the fusion(+) targets based on the algorithm, and surprisingly we saw abundant ALK expression in 6/14 fusion(−) PDX samples. MEGF10, a novel target, was ranked as the top target for both fusion(+) and fusion(−) RMS. MEGF10 plays a role in cell adhesion, motility, and proliferation. It scored as a significant dependency in DepMap for RMS (p-value=0.0002). Based on RNA-sequencing and proteomics, MEGF10 shows no expression in most healthy tissues surveyed, with several orders of magnitude lower expression detected in RNASeq in muscle and brain tissue, but not in the proteomic datasets. Conclusion: Here, we defined the surfaceome of RMS, and found substantial overlap in surface proteins between fusion(+) and fusion(−) RMS subtypes. We validated previous observations that ALK is expressed in RMS, here verifying that the protein is expressed on the plasma membrane. MEGF10 appears to be a strong novel candidate target for RMS immunotherapies, and ongoing work to validate our proteogenomic findings will be reported. Citation Format: Rawan Shraim, Amber K. Weiner, Karina L. Conkrite, Alexander B. Radaoui, John M. Maris, Yael P. Mosse, Sharon J. Diskin, Ahmet Sacan, Benjamin A. Garcia, Peter J. Houghton, Raushan T. Kurmasheva, Poul Sorensen, Gregg B. Morin, Brian Mooney. Proteogenomic prioritization of immunotherapeutic targets in rhabdomyosarcoma nominate MEGF10 for preclinical development [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A009.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».