Preface to the 2021 Video Challenge Supplement for <i>Movement Disorders Clinical Practice</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Relevant disclosures and conflict of interest are listed at the end of this article. The video challenge (VC) remains one of the most popular components of the International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice provides the ideal venue to publish the outstanding cases selected each year for presentation. The 14th annual VC took place at the 25th MDS Congress in September 2021. This event differed in a several ways from previous years. Because of the ongoing pandemic, the entire program was virtual; however, in contrast to the year before and to most of the other components of the 2021 Congress, the VC was presented live in real time. Second, to further adapt to the virtual format the organization of the presentations was revised. Normally, for live congresses we have used a panel of experts to collectively discuss the cases. In 2020, we chose two separate discussants for each case. The first, blinded to the final answer, was charged with summarizing the phenomenology and the possible diagnoses while the second discussant, who had been given the final diagnosis in advance, was charged with providing an academic review of the disorder and take-home messages. For 2021, we limited the second discussants to four special experts who were charged with putting the case into perspective and providing a high-level learning experience. Third, “short cases,” often presented in previous years as “Audience Challenges,” were converted to “Audience Chatlenges,” allowing audience members to discuss the case in the chat box. Finally, and most importantly, after 13 years of the video Olympics/Games/Challenge Dr. Kapil Sethi retired as cohost and was replaced by Dr. Kailash Bhatia. As you will see from the accompanying video, (Video 1) this was not without its problems, but it all worked out well in the end with a seamless transition of cohosting responsibilities. The video accompanying this brief editorial also acknowledges all those involved in review of the cases, provides a more detailed explanation of how the case presentations have been organized, and, at the end, provides the reader the list of the bronze, silver, and gold award winners that were determined at the time of the event. This year, 19 cases were presented (nine long cases, six Audience Chatlenges, and four very brief cases). This Supplement issue contains 13 of these, including two of the three award-winners. Accompanying the published Case Reports are two videos: the first is the classical patient video as described in the manuscript, and the second is the video of the presentation as it took place in the VC event, including the excellent presentations of the two expert discussants. We hope that you will enjoy learning from these thought-provoking and stimulating cases, and we look forward to seeing you live at the Video Challenge in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,052 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».