341.4: Uncovering Work-Related Problems Among Organ Donation Coordinators: The BRiC Research Program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Organ Donation Coordinators (OTDCs) play a fundamental role in deceased organ donation processes. However, due to the emotionally challenging and stressful scenarios faced daily, they are commonly affected by work-related issues (e.g., burnout and compassion fatigue), which can lead to increased turnover, reduced quality of healthcare services and negative impact in Organ Donation Organizations performance. Therefore, Canadian Blood Services has partnered with CHEO Research Institute and the organ and tissue donation community to create a research program to study Burnout and Resilience in OTDCs (The BRiC Research Program). The main objectives of the BRiC Research Program are to investigate the incidence and potential causes of work-related issues among OTDCs and to propose innovative ways of dealing with these issues to support teams and decrease turnover of experienced and exceptional OTDCs. Method: The BRiC Research Program was built using a participatory approach that provides the best evidence possible to help address the specific needs of knowledge users (Organ Donation Organizations and OTDCs). The BRiC started with the development of a core three-phased study: phase 1, we published a scoping review to investigate the available literature on burnout and compassion fatigue among OTDCs; in phase 2, we are using a mixed-methods approach to explore work-related issues among Canadian OTDCs; and in phase 3, informed by phases 1 and 2, we will develop, implement and measurethe impact of interventions designed to address work-related issues among OTDCs. In addition to the core three-phased study, we also completedfour related projects: (1) a working meeting with representatives from Canadian Organ Donation Organizations; (2) a reflective narrative paper co-authored by Canadian OTDCs discussing their views and experiences with work-related issues; (3) a qualitative study that investigated experiences of OTDCs about compassion fatigue, burnout and resilience; and (4) a qualitative study that explored the perceptions of OTDCs related to their experiences in a Relationship Centred Care workshop. Results: An overview of the BRiC Research Program can be found in Figure 1. The outputs of this research program since its launching in 2019 include: a scoping review protocol and a final manuscript publication; three publications regarding the additional projects (reflective narrative, and results from both qualitative studies); 2 poster presentations, 4 invited speaker presentations; and 9 grant applications, 2 granted. Conclusion: The findings from this research program will inform clinical practice through knowledge dissemination activities. As this study has been designed in collaboration with national knowledge disseminators (Canadian Blood Services) and provincial end users (Organ Donation Organizations) it will yield meaningful results that can be readily integrated into strategies to decrease OTDC turnover. We would like to thank Canadian Blood Services and the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario for their support funding this work. We thank all Canadian Organ Donation Organizations and the Organ and Tissue Donation Coordinators for their support and participation in this work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,088 | 0,090 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».