Assessment of Gluten Exposures in Children with Celiac Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Celiac Disease (CD) is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. A strict, lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD) remains the sole treatment for CD. Reports of accidental or intentional ingestion of gluten are common, but little is known about the sources or context of such exposures. OBJECTIVES: We sought to ascertain the self-reported causes for gluten exposure for children with Celiac Disease. DESIGN/METHODS: Parents of children with biopsy-proven CD followed at McMaster Children’s Hospital were asked to review a 22-item questionnaire listing sources, situations and causes of gluten exposure for their child. The questionnaire encompassed both intentional and unintentional gluten exposures and was developed through consultation with Registered Dietitians and Faculty in the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology at McMaster Children’s Hospital. Children independently completed a similar 21-item questionnaire adapted for pediatric use. Participants were invited to describe any additional sources or circumstances leading to gluten consumption not captured in the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 123 families participated in the study with a median of 32 months on a GFD. A minimum of one cause of gluten exposure was selected by 65% of parents and 60% of children. Restaurant dining was identified as a source of gluten consumption by 39% of parents, due to a lack of knowledge of the GFD by restaurant staff or poor labeling of menu items. Other commonly selected items on the parent questionnaire included: difficulty while traveling (13%), to avoid exclusion at social events (12%), and a lack of negative symptoms following gluten exposure (9%). Few parents identified cost (2%), or the availability of gluten-free food as a concern (5%). Children most commonly identified restaurant eating (32%), and the lack of any negative symptoms from eating gluten as the main causes of gluten exposure (14%). In this study population, 11% of children acknowledged consuming gluten because they felt left out at either home, school or with friends. CONCLUSION: This study provides information about the common causes of gluten exposure for children with CD in Ontario, Canada. Restaurant dining and travel were the most commonly identified sources of gluten ingestion. Our study highlights the need for improved menu labeling and education of restaurant staff, requiring both policy changes and dialogue with food service industries. While availability of gluten-free products has greatly improved, exclusion from social activities remain a concern for both children and their parents. Further qualitative studies may build on these identified themes to better understand challenges families face with the GFD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».