Development of a Paediatric Musculoskeletal Skills Workshop for Canadian Medical Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in children account for up to 30% of visits to general practitioners. Doctors who see children with MSK complaints are often not confident in assessing them and MSK exams are poorly documented in medical records. There has been little published literature describing the logistics of teaching MSK skills in a group setting (which is how medical students are commonly taught). At our center, no MSK examination skills were previously taught during the undergraduate paediatrics clerkship. OBJECTIVES: 1) To develop a hands-on, paediatric MSK workshop for medical students with direct observation and feedback. 2) To evaluate student/faculty satisfaction with the workshop. 3) To develop an MSK workshop protocol as a resource for medical educators. DESIGN/METHODS: A 1-hour interactive workshop was designed for students to practice the paediatric Gait, Arms, Legs and Spine (pGALS) screening MSK exam. Students are given pre-reading, videos and pGALS checklists. Workshops include live demonstrations and videos/images of abnormal MSK findings for pGALS practice. Students practice pGALS with their peers with staff supervision(up to 5 physicians present)and receive feedback. All students complete a post-workshop evaluation. Teachers also complete a post-workshop evaluation discussing what went well and areas for improvement. RESULTS: Workshops are delivered every 2 months for 25 students (5 iterations completed). Feedback has been positive (median rating 4.5 on a 5-point Likert scale) for all areas evaluated: objectives, handouts, preparation time, discussion, resources, etc. Comments include: “Helpful and applicable to personal clinical practice,” and, “The hands-on practice was really appreciated, as was the chance to get feedback.” Workshops have been modified according to faculty/student evaluations, resulting in a workshop protocol (organizational template) for future workshop leaders including a teaching checklist, preparation timeline, and PowerPoint to be modified by instructors as they wish. CONCLUSION: The paediatric MSK workshop has been a welcome addition to our undergraduate paediatrics clerkship curriculum. We aim to further develop our workshop by explicitly including applied anatomy, e.g., land-marking for joints. We also aim to make our workshop protocol available on Paediatric Musculoskeletal Matters,www.pmmonline.org, as a resource for other medical educators. Further work will include evaluating its uptake, use and applicability by users in different contexts, and modifying it for different levels of learners, e.g., paediatricians.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».