Development and Implementation of a Novel On-Call Structure for Paediatric Residents
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: At the Alberta Children’s Hospital, residents provide 24-hour coverage of inpatient units through several shifts: a day team, an evening team, an overnight team, and a weekend team. The evening shift was designed to limit consecutive hours worked by the night team, allowing provision of five consecutive nights of coverage. Recently, residents and Hospitalist Pediatricians expressed a desire to optimize the continuity of care provided by our call system. Cross-covering residents working the evening shift felt that they were at higher risk of committing an error during these times. Furthermore, there were external pressures to reduce consecutive resident work hours to less than 15 hours. OBJECTIVES: To design and implement a novel call system for pediatric residents at the Alberta Children’s Hospital. DESIGN/METHODS: A committee was established to identify areas for improvement. Based on stakeholder input, a novel system was created that centered on a 12 hour construct (0800-2000) with a primary “day team” and “night team” for each weekday. A key feature of the system ensured that weekday coverage was provided by “on-service” residents (residents on a CTU rotation) and that weekend coverage was provided by “off-service” residents (on other rotations). The first iteration of the new call system was implemented in April of 2015. RESULTS: A total of 19 residents completed a 6 month follow-up survey in November of 2015;89% of polled residents felt the new system was superior to the previous system. The majority of residents (84%) felt that patient care was improved during the weekdays, with the remaining residents indicating that weekday care was unchanged. Weekend care was felt to be unchanged under the new system by the majority of residents (74%). There were differing opinions on the impact of the new system on resident fatigue level (38% improved, 22% unchanged, 12% worsened, 27% unsure). Surveys indicated that the new system was associated with a lower perceived risk of committing a medical error across all shifts. CONCLUSION: We were able to successfully implement a novel call system which dose not rely on either an evening “covering” shift, or 24 hour shifts. The new call system was very well received by all stakeholders and was associated with improved resident perception of patient care during the week, and decreased perceived risk of medical error across all shifts. The new system was also associated with a trend toward reduced resident fatigue overall.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».