Surveillance of Periodic Fever Syndromes in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Periodic fever syndromes (PFS) represent a group of rare, inflammatory disorders, which have their onset in childhood, and are associated with significant lifelong morbidity, and at times, increased mortality. The majority of affected children have recurrent, self-limited inflammatory episodes with unprovoked fever. The severe inflammatory state during an attack causes signs and symptoms in one or more organ systems. The Canadian Pediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) studies relevant conditions of public health importance that are of such low incidence or prevalence that national ascertainment of cases are needed. Conditions that are studied share a high disability, morbidity and economic costs to society, despite the low frequency. More than 2400 pediatricians including relevant subspecialists, have been enrolled as CPSP participants. This program provides an ideal mechanism for surveillance of PFS in Canada. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of periodic fever syndromes in the Canadian paediatric population, to describe the patterns of presentation, and to raise awareness in the medical community. DESIGN/METHODS: This study was initiated through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP), and was carried out over a three year period ending in September 2014. The case definition included patients less than 18 years of age presenting with a newly diagnosed periodic fever syndrome (PFS). Conditions under surveillance included Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), Hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome (HIDS), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA), and Undefined periodic fever syndromes. The study protocol outlined established clinical and/or genetic criteria for diagnosis. Participating pediatricians and pediat-ric subspecialists across the country were sent monthly reporting forms. Detailed questionnaires were completed by physicians who report a recent diagnosis. Submissions were screened for accuracy and confirmed cases then entered into a database. RESULTS: Between September 2011 and August 2014 a total of 221 cases of PFS were reported. Detailed questionnaires were completed on 194 (88%), from which 13 were excluded. Of the 181 confirmed cases, 85 (47%) were PFAPA, 72 (40%) were undefined PFS, 17 (10%) were FMF, and the remaining 6 cases were CAPS, TRAPS, and HIDS. The mean age at diagnosis was 5.5 years (range 12 months – 16 years). On average symptom onset occurred 2.5 years before diagnosis (range 1-4 years). The majority of reporting physicians were rheumatologists (58%), and paediatricians (36%). Cases were identified in all provinces across Canada with the majority (103, 57%) from Ontario. For the 72 undefined PFS cases the reporting physicians described 36% as PFAPA-like, 10% FMF-like, 5% HIDS-like, 3% CAPS-like, and 1% TRAPS-like. Such cases had features of the specified PFS but either did not meet the full criteria, or confirmatory tests were not available at the time of reporting. Among all cases reported in the study, 58% had genetic testing completed as part of their diagnosis. The majority of cases without any genetic testing had been diagnosed as PFAPA. CONCLUSION: Periodic fever syndromes represent rare forms of autoin-flammatory disease, which affect many Canadian children. This CPSP study identified that the most common PFS diagnosed was PFAPA followed by undefined PFS and FMF. CAPS, HIDS, and TRAPS were rarely diagnosed. Children with PFS were seen by multiple physicians over an average of two to three years before a diagnosis was made. It is hoped that increased awareness of these rare conditions will facilitate earlier diagnosis and the initiation of effective treatments for these children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».