MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4296999338 · doi:10.5194/epsc2022-206

Investigation of the physiological response of cold-adapted microorganisms to extreme environmental stress factors.

2022· preprint· en· W4296999338 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tommaso Zaccaria, Petra Rettberg, Kristina Beblo‐Vranesevic, Marien De Jonge, Mihai G. Netea

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpaceflight effects on biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnceladusAstrobiologyIcy moonExtreme environmentArchaeaHydrothermal ventPlanetMicroorganismDesiccationCircumstellar habitable zoneSolar SystemSaturnJupiter (rocket family)Outer spaceEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcologySpace explorationSpace (punctuation)PhysicsExoplanetBacteriaHydrothermal circulationAstronomyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Exploring the limits of life is one of the objectives for better understanding how organisms have arisen on Earth, how they tolerate extreme conditions and how they might survive on other planets or moons. These investigations could help with understanding which Earth microorganisms could survive on other celestial bodies, such as the icy Moons: Europa (Jupiter) and Enceladus (Saturn). Furthermore, it might help with indicating how life could have developed on Earth or on the icy Moons of the Solar system. This project focuses on the insights from prokaryotic, eukaryotic and archaea organisms which can tolerate the simulated subsurface ocean environment of Europa and Enceladus. The moons have been speculated to have subsurface oceans which are heated by tidal movements or hydrothermal vents. These combined factors could create an environment suitable for life. Furthermore, the mechanism of radiation, desiccation and temperature survival could help us understand whether the organisms could survive a hitchhike on spacecraft surfaces travelling to the moons. During space exploration it is essential to avoid the contamination of planets and moons of astrobiological interest by microorganisms from Earth. The projects’ main question is: What are the boundaries of tolerance for cold-adapted halophilic microorganisms as determined by simulated space conditions? Furthermore, we also want to investigate the survival to simulated icy moon conditions. At this stage of the project two organisms have been investigated, the bacterium Planococcus halocryophilus and the yeast Rhodotorula frigidalcoholis. Our aim is to use one organism from each domain of life: prokaryote, eukaryote and archaea. Preliminary results have shown a fair survival of R. frigidalcoholis but not of P. halocryophilus to some simulated space conditions. In order to find better suited bacterial and archaea candidates we will be investigating cold adapted microorganisms from astrobiologically relevant sites. Examples include the Shaban deep, a brine sediment in the Northern Red sea, permafrost core, Antarctic soil samples, glacier ice and arctic sea-ice cores. The bacteria we have selected are the following: Paenisporosarcina antarctica, Psychromonas boydii, Cryobacterium flavum, Virgibacillus arcticus and Chromohalobacter saracensis. The archaea are: Halorubrum luteum and Halorhabdus tiamatea. The results we processed have shown that R. frigidalcoholis is more tolerant than P. halocryophilus to monochromatic UV-C (254 nm) and polychromatic UV (200-400 nm) as well as X-ray. When exposed to desiccating conditions, at different temperatures, the difference between the two organisms is not so noticeable. The results which we present here have been developed from the microorganisms grown under minimal media conditions, supplemented with a sole carbon source (L-Glutamic acid for R. frigidalcoholis and D-Alanine for P. halocryophilus). The decision to use minimal media and single carbon sources, not as common as glucose, was in support of simulating stress growth conditions to an extent similar to the ones on Europa and Enceladus. Planetary bodies where some simple organics have been detected in low concentrations. Despite the two organisms being isolated from similar environments, R. frigidalcoholis from ice cemented permafrost in University valley (Antarctic) and P. halocryophilus from permafrost active-layer soil in the Canadian High Arctic, they have great differences in their tolerance to extreme conditions. Tested conditions include desiccation survival at: room temperature, -20 and -80°C under oxic and anoxic conditions. Additionally, we can describe a fair survival of R. frigidalcoholis to weekly freeze-thaw conditions from -80°C to 25°C respectively. Being two organisms isolated from arctic-like environments, our hypothesis supported a great tolerance to freeze and thaw conditions. The reduction in relative survival of R. frigidalcoholis to an order of magnitude of 10-2, supports our hypothesis. Of importance to note for this experiment are the -80°C freezing conditions. In the literature similar tests are conducted at higher temperatures (-40 and -10°C). The preliminary results exposing R. frigidalcoholis and P. halocryophilus to harsh growth conditions are useful for initial expectations to survival in environments similar to the ones on Europa or Enceladus. For continuing and future research, this project could be of particular interest for defining a protocol for microbial exposure to simulated extreme environmental conditions. As well as to support the development of suitable planetary protection measures. The following graphs show the results of the described experiments. The figures include in formation on the relative survival of organisms and the F10 values for each condition. The F10 values have been included to represent the dose to which there is 10% survival to the exposed condition. UV-C Irradiation: Polychromatic UV Irradiation: X-ray Irradiation:

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSpaceflight effects on biologyTravaux en français237 207