MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4297144127 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.0001

“A National Library for Canada”: The J.D. Barnett Collection

2020· article· en· W4297144127 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ian D. Rae

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParliamentLibrary sciencePublishingDominionThe artsSociologyDonationLawHistoryMedia studiesPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

“A National Library for Canada”: The J.D. Barnett Collection Ian Rae (bio) This article will examine the development of John Davis Barnett’s private collection of over forty-two-thousand books, which Barnett had hoped to make the foundation of a National Library of Canada but which ultimately became the Arts Library at Western University in London, Ontario.1 Barnett, a resident of Stratford, Ontario, possessed “the greatest private library in the Dominion” at the time of his widely publicized donation to Western in 1918, according to the Ontario Library Review (“Honorary” 4). To give some idea of the scale of Barnett’s collection, the Library of Parliament in Ottawa, when it opened in 1876, contained approximately forty-seven-thousand volumes (“Inside”) out of the 79,486 collected by the governments of Upper and Lower Canada over the previous eight decades (Todd 1).2 Barnett, in the space of sixty years between [End Page 75] his arrival in Canada as a teenager from England in 1866 and his death in 1926, amassed approximately forty-two-thousand volumes in diverse areas of specialization, including early Canadian and American literatures, engineering, religion, Canadian and American history, and Shakespeare studies. Barnett negotiated with federal bureaucrats on a proposal to nationalize his library between 1915 and 1918; however, Ottawa did not construct a national library until 1953. Today, Barnett’s collection is not as well known as the libraries of his wealthier American contemporaries, such as the bibliophiles J.P. Morgan and Henry Huntington, who established private research institutions that still bear their names. Barnett’s collection was no secret in his day: James Henry Morgan observes in The Canadian Men and Women of the Time (1912) that Barnett “possesses one of the largest private libraries in Can[ada], a considerable portion of which is Shakespeariana” (62). In this essay, I will examine the collecting philosophies and public objectives that shaped Barnett’s national project and motivated his correspondence with renowned Shakespeare scholars, such as J. P. Collier, J. O. Halliwell, and F. J. Furnivall. Although Barnett’s collection was best known for its Shakespearean and Canadian contents, American library precedents hold an important place in his national project. The closest analogy for Barnett’s dream would be the Library of Congress in Washington, D. C., which was “shaped primarily by the philosophy and ideas of its principal founder, Thomas Jefferson, who sold his personal library of more than six thousand volumes to Congress to ‘recommence’ its library after its destruction by fire in 1814” (Cole 10). The Library of Congress also adopted Jefferson’s multilingual and interdisciplinary collecting philosophy because, as John Cole observes, “Jefferson believed that ‘there is no subject to which a member of Congress may not have occasion to refer.’ His belief in the necessity of an informed citizenry in a democracy shapes the Library’s determination to widely share its collections” (10). Likewise, Barnett prized the range, diversity, and integrity of his collection. Hence, when the Buffalo Courier reported in 1913 that Harvard University was courting Barnett to buy the Shakespearean component of his collection, the Courier also noted that the collection was not “likely to be dispersed”: Representatives of Harvard University have been negotiating lately, it is understood, to see if the famous Shakespearean library of J. Davis Barnett of Stratford can be secured for that great American seat of learning. It is rather curious that the [End Page 76] finest Shakespearean library in Canada should be in a city no larger than Stratford, and in the possession of a private citizen, yet such is the case.… There is nothing like it in Canada and it is scarcely rivaled in the United States in any private collection.… Mr Barnett has no need to sell, however, and takes his greatest pride in the growth of his library[.] (“Mr Barnett’s”) In this newspaper article, which was reprinted with commentary by the Stratford Beacon, Barnett also hints, perhaps for the first time, that he might donate his collection as a whole to Western: It is generally expected that [the collection] will eventually go to a Canadian university, probably as a gift or legacy, and in this connection McGill...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,924
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207