S06.2 Long-term efficacy and safety of voclosporin with mmf and low-dose steroids: data from the aurora 2 continuation study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose Voclosporin is a novel calcineurin inhibitor approved in the United States in January 2021 for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis in combination with background immunosuppressive therapy. The Phase 3 AURORA 1 study showed that adding voclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and low-dose steroids led to significantly greater reductions in proteinuria at 52 weeks. Given the potentially serious safety concerns associated with the long-term use of oral steroids, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of treatment with voclosporin in patients maintained on low-dose steroids for an additional 24 months in the AURORA 2 continuation study. Methods Key inclusion criteria for the parent AURORA 1 study included biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis (Class III, IV, or V ± III/IV), proteinuria ≥1.5 mg/mg (≥2 mg/mg for Class V) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients who completed AURORA 1 were eligible to enroll in AURORA 2 on the same blinded treatment of voclosporin or placebo in combination with MMF (target dose 2 g/day) and low-dose oral steroids. Per-protocol steroid use in AURORA 1 required a rapid taper from a starting dose of 20–25 mg/day to a target of ≤2.5 mg/day by Week 16. The final dose of steroids in AURORA 1 was the initial starting dose in AURORA 2; the dose could then be adjusted further at the discretion of the study investigator. AURORA 2 was not designed nor powered to address the impact of voclosporin on oral steroid dose. Results In total, 116 patients in the voclosporin arm and 100 patients in the control arm enrolled in AURORA 2. The efficacy observed in patients treated with voclosporin in AURORA 1 was maintained throughout AURORA 2 as indicated by the greater Least Square (LS) mean reductions in UPCR from baseline in the voclosporin arm vs. control arm at all time points (Figure 1A). The overall exposure to oral steroids during the study was similar for both treatment arms; over three years of treatment, the majority of patients were on steroid doses ≤2.5 mg/day (Table 1). There were no new or unexpected safety signals detected in patients who continued on voclosporin treatment compared to control-treated patients with similar rates of serious adverse events in the voclosporin (18.1%) and control arms (23.0%). There were no deaths in the voclosporin arm during AURORA 2; four deaths were reported in the control arm (pulmonary embolism [n=1], coronavirus infection [n=3]). Mean eGFR remained stable throughout the study (Figure 1B). Conclusions Voclosporin was safe and well-tolerated over three years of treatment with a similar safety profile to control and no unexpected safety signals detected. Further, the significant reductions in proteinuria initially achieved in AURORA 1 were maintained in AURORA 2 even in the absence of traditional high-dose steroids. These data provide evidence of a long-term treatment benefit of voclosporin in patients with lupus nephritis and also support the use of lower doses of steroids in the treatment of this disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».