MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4297349518 · doi:10.56952/arma-2022-0668

Simulating Wellbore Integrity During Drilling in Gas Hydrate Bearing Sediments by Coupled THMD Model

2022· article· en· W4297349518 sur OpenAlexaff
Y. Wang

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Établissements canadiensPetro Geotech (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCabin pressurizationHydrateInstabilityDrilling fluidPetroleum engineeringClathrate hydrateDrillingPore water pressureSaturation (graph theory)GeologyWellboreMechanicsDeepwater drillingGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Wellbore integrity in a gas hydrate bearing formation during drilling remains great challenge as a complex solid-fluid and decomposed hydrate process interaction is involved. A wellbore temperature increase and/or depressurization processes my induce additional stresses and extra fluid flow, which in turn may trigger wellbore instability and unexpected fracturing. In order to understand and quantify the thermal-hydraulic-mechanical behavior with hydrate decomposition (THMD) process and the wellbore responses to the pressure and temperature variation under a given in-situ stress regime, a fully coupled THMD model is proposed and developed in this paper. A simplified semi-analytical solution for the induced stresses, pore pressure, and temperature change at the wellbore and inside the formation is presented. A linear Mohr-Coulomb criterion is utilized to define the onset of the wellbore instability in which a hydrate saturation depending cohesion is also incorporated. Laplace transformation is applied and a numerical method is used to solve the transformed homogeneous PDE. We conclude that thermally and hydration induced stresses may affect wellbore integrity during hydrate gas production due to wellbore pressure reduction and temperature increase. Unlike those stress perturbation in the conventional gas reservoir, critical temperature and pressure must be surpassed and additional incremental stresses may be induced due to the hydrate hydrate decomposition. Also additional fluid mass and energy transfer may take place by which both temperature and pore pressure may be induced due to the hydrate decomposition/recomposition. In additional the hydrate saturation change due to the typical drilling strategy applied may reduce the hydrate formation significantly,and this may also affect the production pressure control and management. Thus managing pressure for both maximum production and wellbore integrity must be optimized accordingly. 1. INTRODUCTION Wellbore stability has been a long-observed and widely studied problem during drilling and production in petroleum industries. Stresses around a created borehole due to primarily the in-situ stress from the far-field may increased during drilling and production when the wellbore pressure is reduced. Once such an induced stress state exceeds a strength, measured or estimated, a borehole stability issue, i.e. the borehole lost its integrity, will be brought up. Other than affected by the intact formation strength and initial in-situ stresses, wellbore orientation, formation hydraulic and thermal conditions, and drilling mud chemistry are all critical factors in stability analysis [Bradley, 1979; Santarilli et al., 1986, Detournay and Cheng, 1988; Ewy and Cook, 1990; Wang et al., 1996; Gassemi and Liu, 2005; Neyan, 2010]. Producing hydrate gas either by depressurization or/and increasing wellbore temperature has been proposed for gas exploitation in gas hydrate-bearing sediments (GHBS)[Masuda et al., 1997; Moridis, 2003; Moridis et al., 2007]. Wellbore stability has been reported due to a much more complex mechanical responses maybe provoked near a borehole to the exploiting procedure mentioned [Hyoto et al., 2002; 2008; 2013; 2014; Li et al., 2019,Wang, 2019]. The most economical approach in producing hydrate gas is to change the ice-like hydrate into fluid by reducing the pressure or increase the temperature so that a critical equilibrium condition is exceeded [Kim, 1987; Holder and Hand; 1982]. Such a procedure on the other hand will dissociate the hydrate so that newly created fluid (water and /or gas) mass may alter the conventional equilibrium condition. The new dynamic equilibrium system due the hydrate phase change may affect the mechanical response of the entire formation and particularly in the vicinity of the borehole, where phase change shall take place first and persist until the solid hydrate is decomposed completely. Furthermore the formation strength may be reduced significantly after hydrate dissociation [Masui et al., 2005; 2008; Hyoto et al., 2002; 2008; 2013, 2014; Li et al., 2019; Priest et al.; 2019]. A coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model with hydrate dissociation (THMD) is proposed and numerical methods are typically utilized, i.e. Uchida et al., [2013]; Freij-Ayoub et al., 2017]. Although analytical solutions are convenient and a tool easy to use, but difficult to be tractable, a semi-analytical solution is developed in this paper for borehole mechanical responses under depressurization. A analytical solution and fully coupled THMD model are required for drilling and well integrity design during drilling and production; A semi-analytical solution is developed by incorporating THMD model including phase change and hydrate saturation-dependent cohesion. Specifically the solution is applicable specifically for the situations when the critical temperature/pressure are surpassed, i.e. the solid hydrate dissociation initiates and is decomposed into water and gas phase. Unlike those in the conventional reservoirs, the cohesion in GHBS is weakened significantly with hydrate saturation reduction [Koyno et al.,2002; 2008; 2013; 2014; Li et al., 2019]. gas and water saturation are balanced between fluid extraction at a producing well and supply from either the adjacent formation and those decomposed in each pore volume. The porosities based on the pore volume in the solid phase from the porous skeleton and combined solid hydrate+skeleton should be defined, as

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,040
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,080

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→Travaux en français237 207→