MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4297828245 · doi:10.1061/9780784484401.032

Eccentricity Coefficient in Berthing Energy Calculations

2022· article· en· W4297828245 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePorts 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering and Materials Science Studies
Établissements canadiensHatch (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEccentricity (behavior)Computer scienceEnergy (signal processing)StatisticsMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of the eccentricity coefficient in berthing energy calculations is to estimate the portion of the ship’s kinetic energy that fenders must absorb in side-berthing scenarios where angular motion of the ship results from the initial fender contact. Analytical derivations of the eccentricity coefficient were initially introduced to the industry in the 1950s and 1960s. Several analytical solutions were proposed at the time, derived by adopting sets of varying assumptions. More notably, solutions formulated by Vasco Costa and Saurin gained popularity and were eventually introduced into marine design guidelines where they remain relatively unchanged to this day. These guidelines also introduced the notion that berthing velocities of ships approaching under tug-assist should be taken as normal to the berth face, and as such, guidance provided to practitioners on velocity selection for side-berthing scenarios apply only to this approach condition. Standard methods for fender performance rating were also developed based on this assumption, with the energy absorption capacity measurements obtained by compressing the fenders in a direction normal to their base. Authors like Vasco Costa did not necessarily adhere to this simplified approach in their derivation and proposed application of the eccentricity coefficient. Consequently, when ship berthing schematics based on Vasco Costa’s work were introduced in the design guidelines, they portrayed a general solution to side-berthing in which the velocity vector contained a notable longitudinal component. These schematics were seldom updated to reflect the simplified normal direction of the berthing velocity assumed in the guidelines. Since the velocity and berthing approach angles depicted in these general solutions are often used as direct input in the eccentricity coefficient formulae, finding diverse interpretations in fender selection calculations is a common occurrence in cases where practitioners believe special consideration of potential longitudinal velocity may exist because of water currents or due to particular berthing practices. It is also common to find poor and contradictory statements in the definition of these and other input variables in codes and standards, leading to further confusion and misuse of these equations, even when applied to simpler berthing scenarios. A re-derivation of the commonly used eccentricity coefficient solutions provides clarity around the basic assumptions, term definitions, and appropriate application in marine guidelines such as PIANC, MOTEMS, and BS 6349, in a manner that is consistent with the velocity vector assumptions and standard fender performance rating procedures. This paper provides recommendations for existing guidelines that include the adoption of new ship berthing schematics that depict clearly the normal-velocity condition assumed by the standards; clarification that, with very few exceptions, the longitudinal component of the kinetic energy in side-berthing scenarios is assumed to be conserved as longitudinal motion and not absorbed by the fenders; and lastly, clarification that given the stated assumptions, the eccentricity coefficient in side-berthing scenarios only modifies the normal component of the total kinetic energy and therefore the input values used in the eccentricity coefficient equations must reflect the condition in which the velocity vector is normal to the fender base.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,350

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,176
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle