A study of seasonal variations of traffic collisions and their machine learning prediction model for highways in B.C.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Traffic collisions are considered as one of the world’s major public health problems. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 1.3 million people die every year in traffic collisions across the world and a further 20 - 50 million are injured or disabled. Various tools/methods were developed to assess highway safety. Historically, collision frequency, collision rates, linear regression and generalized linear regression, and Bayesian modeling methods have been used as the basis for safety analysis. Research has shown that there are limitations with this approach due to the non-linear relationship between collision frequency and exposure. Traffic volume is directly related to traffic exposure, traffic exposure affects collision risk and collision risk significantly determines the probability of traffic collision occurring. The different traffic exposure has a different level of effects on collision risk, and different level of collision risk results in the different probability of collision occurring and collision severity. Collision prediction modeling (Safety Performance Function) is the recommended technique for estimating road safety in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). However, the prediction modeling has not taken into consideration of traffic seasonal variations, collision seasonal variations and weather impacts as the annual average daily traffic (AADT) is one of main dominant variables. Previous studies indicate that weather especially winter weather condition is significantly associated with the traffic collisions. For example, studies showed that 24% of all collisions are weather-related in United States and collision risk could increase from 50 to 100 percent during precipitation. Due to climate change, weather patterns are changing, and the frequency of extreme weather events increases, which will affect highway safety and reliability. This study synthesizes the major findings and proposed methodologies from the existing traffic safety studies. Collision risks related to weather are investigated and assessed. Traditional techniques of highway safety assessment without the consideration of seasonal variations of traffic collisions, especially winter weather condition impacts in Canada, might result in underestimating the safety risk in winter weather conditions. All predication models developed to date have not taken into consideration of traffic and collision seasonal variations, and weather condition. Machine learning (ML) is able to address non-linear relationship between traffic exposure and collision frequency, to handle multivariate data, and to improve over time in the traffic collision prediction modelling. Two major highways (Highways 16 and 97) with a total length of approximate 2,500 km within Northern Region in the Province of British Columbia, Canada, are investigated. This study has mainly focused on the seasonal variations of collisions and traffic volumes to improve the highway safety. A traffic collision prediction model integrated traffic seasonal variations and weather impacts is proposed and developed by applying machine learning (ML) techniques (neural network regression) in the study. In conclusion, the proposed model is able to predict the traffic collision seasonal variations, and to provide more accurate estimate of traffic collisions with over 90% accuracy on both rural and urban highways. The model can be used to assist in developing road safety improvement policy considering collision seasonal characteristics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».