Evaluating Patient Satisfaction and Qualitative Outcomes during an Abstinence-Based Indigenous Residential Treatment Program in Northern Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Indigenous peoples with substance use disorders (SUD) and intergenerational trauma (IGT) have a variety of needs across the range of symptom severity and the challenging dual disorder (1). To address these needs, a continuum of holistic care that includes intensive treatment services and support must be in place (2–4). In collaboration with the North Shore Tribal Council and Benbowopka Treatment Center in Ontario, Canada, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Abstinence-Based treatment model in place prior to implementing a novel treatment approach based on blending Indigenous healing practices and a mainstream treatment model, ‘Seeking Safety,’ for the treatment of Indigenous patients with a history of IGT and SUD in a four-week residential treatment program in Blind River, Northern Ontario. This paper is a retrospective qualitative analysis of an Indigenous community-run residential treatment program operating under an abstinence-based model prior to implementing a novel treatment paradigm based in Indigenous teachings and Seeking Safety. Methods: The historical data was collected from Benbowopka’s patient records; (n = 343) from January 2013 to March 2016 (end of the 2015 fiscal year). The data has been divided into the fiscal year and intake period at the request of Benbowopka. We evaluated the results of the abstinence-based model intervention against three distinct primary outcomes (1. The patient perspective, 2. The program perspective, and 3. The community perspective). The following variables were collected: name, health card number, date of birth, postal code, status card number, gender, date of admission to the program, date of discharge, program completion (Y/N), Indigenous (Y/N), status First Nation (Y/N), on reserve (Y/N), primary substance, and secondary substance(s). Any pertinent notes were also included in the data. All discussions and feedback from the Client Quality Assurance Survey tool was subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Four core themes were identified: (1) Motivation to attend treatment; (2) Understanding Benbowopka’s treatment program and needs to be met; (3) Satisfaction with all interventions; and (4) Moving forward. We thus utilized a proposed conceptualized descriptive framework for the four core themes depicted in the medicine wheel. The center of the medicine wheel represented headings (self, family, children, worker, and community) or a lens, which participants used to frame their experiences. Conclusion: This research has identified that SUD Indigenous residential treatment programs need to include culture, healing practices, activities and relationships that are part of the treatment process. This study found that the cultural elements and healing practices of the program were highly valued by clients in the Blind River, Northern Ontario, Northern Indigenous residential treatment program.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».