MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4298088553 · doi:10.1111/jdv.18622

Monkeypox vaccine: Special considerations for dermatologic patients

2022· letter· en· W4298088553 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miriam Fernández‐Parrado, Francisco José Rodríguez‐Cuadrado, Elena Lucía Pinto‐Pulido

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2022
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePoxvirus research and outbreaks
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMonkeypoxVacciniaSmallpoxVirologyMedicineVirusSmallpox vaccineHerd immunityVaccinationImmunityAttenuated vaccineSmallpox virusImmune systemImmunologyBiologyGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1980, the worldwide eradication of smallpox was declared, making its vaccination unnecessary and consequently producing a decrease in herd immunity against the virus.1 However, there is still a risk of a potential reintroduction of the disease either accidentally or intentionally. Likewise, there is the possibility of other orthopoxviruses (OPXV) emergence, as occurred in 2022 with Monkeypox virus (MPX), the etiological agent of monkeypox.2, 3 OPXV has a stable genome with a highly conserved protein structure, so although there are no vaccines specifically designed against MPX, smallpox vaccines may provide cross-immunity with an efficacy of more than 80%.3-6 These vaccines contain different strains of another OPXV called Vaccinia virus. The most commonly used strains in first- and second-generation vaccines have been Lister, Bern and Paris in Europe, New York City Board of Health (NYCBH) in North America, Tian Tan (VTT) in China, and Dairen and Ikeda in Japan.4 The original or first-generation vaccines are not currently available, but there are second- and third-generation vaccines with a better safety profile. However, their efficacy has not been demonstrated in real conditions.7 Second-generation vaccines, just like the original vaccines, contain live Vaccinia virus with replication capacity.8 They are administered in a single dose by multiple intradermal punctures, where the contact between the virus and the immune system takes place. It produces a papule that evolves into a vesicle or pustule, finally forming a scab which leaves a small scar.8 In addition to immunosuppression and the other usual contraindications for any live virus vaccine, the following dermatoses also contraindicate vaccination: a history of atopic dermatitis (AD) regardless of its degree of activity or severity, severe acne, Darier disease, psoriasis, impetigo, herpetic infection, extensive diaper dermatitis and burns.8 Cohabitants of persons with such pathologies should also avoid vaccination due to the risk of contagion through the lesion produced at the inoculation site.8 Moreover, although most of the adverse reactions to these vaccines are mild or self-limited, sometimes more serious reactions can occur, such as myocarditis or pericarditis.9 Skin reactions may be caused directly by the Vaccinia virus (eczema vaccinatum, generalized vaccinia or vaccinia gangrenosum) or immuno-mediated (erythema multiforme minor, Stevens–Johnson syndrome).9 Cases of encephalitis, encephalomyelitis and foetal Vaccinia infection have also been occasionally reported.9 An attenuated replication-defective Vaccinia virus strain called Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) was developed through multiple serial passages in Germany. It was used during 1969–1988 as a first vaccine against smallpox in vulnerable population before the administration of the live virus vaccine to attenuate or avoid the side effects of the latter. Despite smallpox eradication, this MVA strain continued being modified, developing MVA-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN), a highly attenuated MVA unable to replicate in mammals.4, 10 This third-generation vaccine is even safer than its predecessor. Several studies have shown it is suitable for immunosuppressed persons including HIV patients and people with AD or other dermatoses.4, 7, 10 It was registered by the European Medicines Agency as Imvanex® and it is also known as JYNNEOS® in USA and Imvamune® in Canada. It is administered subcutaneously and two doses are required.7 Its efficacy has been compared with second-generation vaccines through two surrogate variables (the geometric mean of the antibody titre and the decrease in lesion size induced by the subsequent administration of the second-generation vaccine), obtaining a comparable efficacy with a better safety profile.7 It could also protect against the disease after infection, as shown in animal models trials with a virus similar to Variola virus.7 Given the dimensions of the current monkeypox outbreak (with more than 20,000 cases and 4 deaths in Europe to date), an increase in morbidity and mortality is expected as a consequence of the rise in the number of monkeypox patients with some type of immunosuppression, such as HIV.3 At this stage, although mass vaccination does not seem necessary for the time being according to World Health Organization, the MVA vaccine could still mark a milestone in the history of Public Health, as the original vaccine designed by Edward Jenner did.3, 4 None. None. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,437
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyMême sujetPoxvirus research and outbreaksTravaux en français237 207