Reinventing the nursing home: metaphors that design care
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Nursing homes are usually considered places of last resort – places imbued with our fears of ageing, dependence, frailty and dying (Vladeck, 2003). No doubt this reputation is also related to the long-term care sector's historical connections to the poor house and insane asylum (Struthers, 1998; Ward-Griffin and Marshall, 2003). Reinforcing nightmare visions of the nursing home are news media reports of scandal, violence and mistreatment (Lloyd et al, 2014). The resulting nursing home social imaginary, reflected and disseminated in film, fiction, news reports and academic panels, is of decrepit, demented people who are neglected and abused by unreliable, uncaring staff, rejected by hapless, heartless families and over-medicated by indifferent, incapable medical experts. In response, the nursing home sector has been active in resisting and overcoming this negative image. Designers, regulators, researchers, funders, advocates and operators have been reimagining the nursing home, working to escape its poor reputation through design. They have adapted the architecture, furnishings, décor, spatial and social arrangements of familiar environments with positive associations, such as ‘home’, ‘hotel’, ‘village’ and ‘hospital,’ to produce new forms of nursing home care. In this chapter, I argue that using adaptations of dominant forms of social arrangements as the basis for nursing home redesign results in a reinstitution of inequities for older people and those who care for them, despite the best intentions of the designers. These adaptations limit what we imagine for adults in late life – and for our elderly selves – to what is familiar, rather than respond to what may be more equitable and comfortable. Throughout the chapter my goal is to make connections between these spaces of care, everyday life and critical research on ageing. This argument developed through conducting two research projects in 2011-14: a project that explored long-term care design regulations and their consequences in Nova Scotia and Ontario, Canada and an international project that identified promising practices in long-term residential care. The first project involved collecting and analysing design information and photographs from 71 long-term care homes, 21 key informant interviews and field notes from 14 site visits (Braedley and Martel, 2015). The second project used rapid site-switching ethnography (Baines and Cunningham, 2011) to study long-term care homes in Canada, Sweden, UK and the US, selected for their potential for promising practices.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle