MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4298472922 · doi:10.18438/b80048

CHLA: Call for Contributed Papers and Posters

2007· article· en· W4298472922 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Editorial Team

Notice bibliographique

RevueEvidence Based Library and Information Practice · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth Sciences Research and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNoticeLibrary scienceInformation literacyPublic relationsComputer scienceMedical educationWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Canadian Health Libraries Association invites you to submit contributed papers or posters for its 2008 annual conference, to be held in Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 23-30. Papers may describe innovative programs/practices or new research findings and should relate to the overall conference theme - “Navigating the Seas of Change”. Notice: The deadline for the submission of abstracts for papers and posters has been extended to January 15, 2008. Call for Contributed Papers In the library world, change is practically the only constant. The 2008 CHLA conference will focus on managing change and changing practice. As information professionals we seek out new practices and technologies. We evaluate them and adopt the useful ones. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) uses evidence derived from research, user feedback and observation to improve practice. It provides excellent guidance to improve library and information service. You are invited to share your research evidence, combined with practical observations about the primary ways information professionals improve information delivery. How has the framework moved from librarians storing physical information, to information professionals facilitating knowledge use? How do we plan to survive and thrive in tomorrow’s information age? Papers will be accepted from a broad range of topics, including in particular: Changing Access • Implication for information professionals of new technologies and portals like Nurse One; • Health Literacy – access for patients where it counts; • Use of health technology assessment from CADTH & other agencies. Changing Practice and Collaboration • Research, teaching, reaching beyond the walls and outside the profession, for example collaborations between professional organizations; libraries in different countries, and partnerships between hospitals and universities; • Implementing research, knowledge transfer, evidence-based practice & systematic reviews. Publishing/ Open Access • OA research and projects like EBLIP Journal and Open Medicine. Accepted contributed papers will each be allotted approximately 20 minutes for presentation, plus 5-10 minutes for questions. To be considered, please submit the following information by January 15, 2008. • Title of the paper; • A short structured abstract of 250 words or less; • Primary author's name, address and business phone number. Structured abstracts should follow JCHLA Instruction to Authors at: http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/jchla/jchla26/c04-900.pdf Submissions should be e-mailed to the program committee member, Paul Clark, at Paul.Clark@rvh.nb.ca. The Program Committee will contact all those submitting abstracts for contributed papers by January 19, 2008. Conference registration fees will not be waived for presenters of contributed papers. Call for Posters Poster sessions comprise visual presentations of information about research or other projects. They offer conference delegates a less formal alternative to contributed papers and plenary sessions, as well as an opportunity to interact directly with those responsible for the presentations. Posters are invited along the same themes as those of the contributed papers, although submissions along other themes also are welcome. Poster presenters will be allotted a display board (4' x 8') and table space. A limited number of electrical connections will be available for electronic poster presentations. If you are planning an electronic poster presentation, you must bring your own laptop computer as well as a standalone version of your presentation. You will be required to staff your print or electronic poster during a portion of the conference; posters will be open to viewing by conference delegates for two days of the conference. To submit a poster for consideration, please send an email by January 15, 2008 with the following information: • outline of the topic; • a brief structured abstract (no more than 250 words). Structured abstracts should follow JCHLA/JABSC Instruction to Authors. (http://www.chla-absc.ca/journal/index.html) Submissions should be e-mailed to the poster chair, Ann Barrett, at: Ann.Barrett@dal.ca. Conference registration fees will not be waived for presenters of posters. The Poster Committee will contact all those submitting abstracts for posters by January 19, 2008. Tips on designing posters: Include the title, the author(s), affiliation(s), and a description of the research, highlighting the major elements that are covered in the structured abstract. Posters are visual – add pictures, graphs, charts etc. to make the poster interesting. Keep text to a minimum and use a large font size so that the poster can be read from a distance. Keep some white space - don’t overwhelm the reader with too much text or graphics. Use color creatively. If you laminate the poster, consider using a low-glare or matte finish. Consider bringing copies of your poster for handout. Ensure that your poster is set up and taken down at the specified times. For more information, please check these websites: http://www.soe.uoguelph.ca/webfiles/agalvez/poster/ http://educ.queensu.ca/~ar/poster.htm http://www.esf.edu/its/html/posterref.htm For more information about themes and sample poster topics, contact the Poster Chair. Posters from previous conferences may be found at: http://www.chla-absc.ca/assoc/conference.html

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,894
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,151

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0100,005
Science ouverte0,0040,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,8940,839

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,429
Écart entre enseignants0,376 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEvidence Based Library and Information PracticeMême sujetHealth Sciences Research and EducationTravaux en français237 207