Ophthalmology on social networking sites: an observational study of Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn
Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.
Le tri à trois modèles
les 1 000 travaux triés →Les trois modèles ont qualifié ce travail de métarecherche. Il appartient au noyau consensuel du domaine.
Observational study of the social media presence and reach of ophthalmology journals, associations and publications; the object is scholarly and professional dissemination practice.
It studies how ophthalmology journals and professional organizations use social media for scholarly dissemination.
Observational study of ophthalmology journals and associations on social platforms; object is scholarly communication.
Résumé
Jonathan A Micieli,1 Edmund Tsui2 1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA Background: The use of social media in ophthalmology remains largely unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the extent and involvement of ophthalmology journals, professional associations, trade publications, and patient advocacy and fundraising groups on social networking sites. Methods: An archived list of 107 ophthalmology journals from SCImago, trade publications, professional ophthalmology associations, and patient advocacy organizations were searched for their presence on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Activity and popularity of each account was quantified by using the number of “likes” on Facebook, the number of followers on Twitter, and members on LinkedIn. Results: Of the 107 journals ranked by SCImago, 21.5% were present on Facebook and 18.7% were present on Twitter. Journal of Community Eye Health was the most popular on Facebook and JAMA Ophthalmology was most popular on Twitter. Among the 133 members of the International Council of Ophthalmology, 17.3% were present on Facebook, 12.8% were present on Twitter, and 7.5% were present on LinkedIn. The most popular on Facebook was the International Council of Ophthalmology, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology was most popular on Twitter and LinkedIn. Patient advocacy organizations were more popular on all sites compared with journals, professional association, and trade publications. Among the top ten most popular pages in each category, patient advocacy groups were most active followed by trade publications, professional associations, and journals. Conclusion: Patient advocacy groups lead the way in social networking followed by professional organizations and journals. Although some journals use social media, most have yet to engage its full potential and maximize the number of potential interested individuals. Keywords: social media, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, ophthalmology
Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.
La notice
- Revue
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
- Thématique
- Social Media in Health Education
- Domaine
- Social Sciences
- Établissements canadiens
- —
- Organismes subventionnaires
- —
- Mots-clés
- Observational studySocial mediaInternet privacyCyberpsychologyPsychologyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceMedicine
- Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
- oui