MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4299585463 · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00345.x

Editorial preface

2012· article· en· W4299585463 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMicrobial Biotechnology · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHost (biology)Resource (disambiguation)MultitudeData scienceEcologyBiologyOrganismComputer sciencePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The international symposium on ‘Microbial resource management (MRM) in biotechnology: Concepts & applications’ has been organized for the first time on 30 June and 1 July 2011 in Ghent, Belgium. The aim of the first MRM symposium was to discuss about the latest breakthroughs on more fundamental concepts of microbial communities and on their applications in environmental technologies and nutritional/biomedical sciences. A microbial community consists of a multitude of functional biological entities, each with unique metabolic capacities. When properly organized, the assemblage of these biological entities represents a powerful resource. Especially for engineered systems, MRM is the ultimate objective, yet remains very challenging. Well-documented MRM concepts and tools should allow to steer complex microbial communities, leading to stable and reliable biotechnological processes. This first edition therefore focused on the introduction of these MRM concepts and tools to both academic and industrial researchers around the topic of microbial ecology and technology. Four central themes were discussed in the oral and poster presentations. The conference started with the theme ‘Managing bacteria-host interactions’. Evolution of higher organisms has taken place in a world where microbes are omnipresent. The massive colonization of host surfaces (skin, gut. . .) by microorganisms has forced the host to develop strategies that allow a peaceful coexistence with their microbial inhabitants. Not only does the host need to distinguish benign from detrimental microbes, he also needs an adequate response to opportunistic pathogens. Understanding the fundamental processes behind the delicate balance in host–microbe interactions can result in a more accurate management of the host microbial community. This may pave the way for new applications in the medical field as well as the pharmaceutical and food/feed industry. Keynote contributions by Ruth Ley and Nathalie Delzenne were inspirational for in-depth discussions. The second set of talks was about ‘Exploiting the water-energy nexus’. Current conventional wastewater treatment is based on the energy-demanding and dissipative treatment of low pollutant concentrations. However, projections of the growing global population, increasing urbanization and higher water stress force us to look for a completely different and more sustainable approach, recovering energy, valuable products and safe water. Key biotechnological applications for this approach include anaerobic digestion, highly loaded activated sludge, bioelectrochemical systems, low temperature bioprocesses and bio-based disinfection and removal of recalcitrant chemicals. Furthermore, emission of greenhouse gases should be minimal. In this session, not only single technologies but also novel treatment schemes will be brought forward, making way for future sustainable reuse of the resources in wastewater. Cees Buisman and Lars Angenent presented highly appreciated keynote presentations. In the third theme, the focus was on ‘Microbial Resource Analysis’. In order to manage microbial communities, we need to understand their social behaviour and community composition. Molecular microbiology and all the ‘omics’ are used to correlate biodiversity (community richness and evenness) with functional stability, allowing to compare with well-known ecological theories. Translating this basic research to applications remains the biggest challenge for the future. Eye-opening keynote talks were delivered by Tom Curtis and Jeroen Raes. The fourth theme focused on ‘Nutrients in wastewater: balancing between removal and recovery’. All over the world, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations are increasing in surface waters, leading to eutrophication and its many adverse affects. Furthermore, the steep increase of fertilizer requirements, energy prices and P-resource shortage stimulates nutrient recovery from wastewater. Facing these facts, nutrient management in wastewater has to focus on low nutrient levels in the effluent, through a sustainable and cost-effective combination of removal and recovery technologies. Several recent discoveries in the microbial nitrogen cycle resulted in a spectrum of energy-friendly opportunities with low direct greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, an assortment of bio-processes can contribute to a more desirable quality of P-containing sludge, enabling to replace artificial fertilizer in a direct or indirect way. Especially source-separated and (pre)concentrated streams offer excellent recovery possibilities. This session will not only provide floor to applications of microbial-assisted nutrient conversions, but also to their mind-shifting discoveries. Mark van Loosdrecht and Marc Strous left the audience stimulated with their keynote contributions. The first MRM conference was closed by Willy Verstraete, challenging all keynote speakers as well as the audience with his proposed ‘Perspectives for microbial biotechnology’. Microbial biotechnology depends on soft genes and hard technology. Breakthroughs in both domains are plentiful and their combinations allow generating a multitude of ‘publishable’ possibilities. Yet, to detect effective niches of implementation is the super challenge every scientist faces. The fact that we have entered a phase of transition towards a non-fossil fuel based economy offers a unique set of powerful potentials. The symposium had no less than 160 registered participants, originating from all over the world, including Australia, Russia, Canada and the USA, which was remarkable since the major focus of the announcement lied within Europe and since it was quite a short conference. The fact that participants were originating from all over the world emphasizes the fascination of several research groups to MRM. Apart from the scientific representation on the symposium, there was also industrial interest in the conference subjects, which was reflected by the active and passive participation of several industrial contestants in the conference by oral or poster presentation. Fifteen companies supported part of the conference financially and exhibited their industrial activities. The financial contributions by Bio-Rad, VWR, OWS, Colsen, ProDigest, Avecom, Chrisal, Waterleau, Global Water Engineering, Essencia, Austep, Oxoid & Remel Products, Nutrient Recovery Systems, Accuri Cytometers and Janssen Pharmaceutica were highly appreciated. At the end of the symposium, among the 80 presented posters, prices were granted for eight excellent posters: Amandine Everart and Charlotte Grootaert (theme 1), David van der Ha and Amit Kumar (theme 2), Katarzyna Bialek and Micol Bellucci (theme 3), and Francis Meerburg and Samik Bagchi (theme 4). The symposium left the audience confident and inspired that in the next decade, new insights will generate new tools to implement MRM, which will be vital for a better environment, a more performing biotechnology, and a better human health and well-being at large.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,457
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle