Ageing bodies, driving and change: exploring older body–driver fit in the high-tech automobile
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Today's world of automobiles, in its wondrous integration of mechanical and digital technologies, including the prospect of self-driving cars, is far removed from anything traditional manufacturers or drivers could have imagined. The embedding of advanced vehicle technology into the automobile has resulted in vehicles that are more akin to ‘hightech devices on wheels’. The term advanced vehicle technologies (AVTs) refers to sophisticated computer and electronically mediated systems that assist drivers with driving-related tasks, provide warnings to prevent a crash, and, at times, assume control over driving. As outlined in Canada's road safety strategy 2025 , AVTs, which include back-up cameras and adaptive cruise control, are considered to have the potential to improve driver safety (Canadian Council of Motor Vehicle Administrators, 2016). Unsurprisingly, in a context whereby communities are increasingly populated by older drivers, gerontologists, transportation experts and human factors specialists have all heralded AVTs as particularly relevant for older people – viewing AVTs as offering the means to compensate for age- and health-related changes that can affect driving (see, for example, Dickerson et al, 2007). Scholars have thus begun to assess whether AVTs can redress critical driving skills among older drivers. A recent literature review provided evidence to support the claim that AVTs can assist older drivers in ways that improve their behind-the-wheel performance (Eby et al, 2016). While safety and driving performance are key public concerns, driving also features strongly in everyday lives, in feeling and achieving independence, and in social mobility, as well as simply in the experience of movement in and around communities. Driving involves a somatic intimacy between the older body, person, machine, the means to meet daily needs (for example, fetching groceries and so on) and larger links with society and/or social contacts (for example, socialising). And yet, less attention is devoted to older drivers as ‘agents’ and/or to understanding the experiences of driving. Employing qualitative interviews, we focus on the experience and changing relationship between the older driver and the technological vehicle. We explore the ‘fit’ between an older driver body and a high-tech automobile from an embodied and phenomenological point of view. The first part of this chapter explains the theoretical basis of the study as we explore how phenomenological and sociological perspectives on the body contrast with the dominant human factors approach that guides scientific investigation on ‘user’ experience and driver characteristics in relation to advancements in human–machine interfaces.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».