MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4300202812 · doi:10.21608/jso.2018.233005

من النموالإقتصادی إلی السعادة الإقتصادیة

2018· article· ar· W4300202812 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revueمجلة البحوث الإدارية · 2018
Typearticle
Languear
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In recent years, the expression “Digital Economy” has strongly emerged. In its simplest form, digital economy can be defined by doing economic activities using information and communication technologies.What contributed in the widespread use of digital economy is the birth of the internet in general and one of its greatest services which is the service of “World Wide Web” or as they call the “WWW”. The strongest side of the Internet is its ability to changes the world converting it from a vast space to a small domain where the barriers of place and time have vanished. The importance of digital economy stems from being an important matter to both individuals and governments.For many years, people considered the GDP the indicator for people happiness and countries welfare, this has proven wrong. That is because GDP was built on only measurable financial transactions, any other activity that cannot be represented in a recorded transaction, the GDP neglect it.Due to this problem, important issues such as family spending, education, mental health and environmental activities cannot be represented, and economy in general and the GDP in particular lost its power as an indicator for happiness and countries welfare. Accordingly, in the year (6006) an organization called (New Economics Foundation “NEF”) introduced to the world a new indicator of happiness and called (Happy Planet Index “HPI”) a British company that gave priority to people rather than to economy. That index took into account several factors other than economic ones, those factors were such as: mental health, environment, family spending and several others.The United Nations has followed suit, urged the world to look after their people welfare and introduced to the world another index in 6022 and called also the (Happy Planet Index “HPI”). In the year 6025 the UN published its first happy planet report and generated two other reports in 6022 and in 6022.All indicators discarded economy and economic indicators as they considered those indicators misleading as they discard important factors that are not represented by financial transactions, and depended on surveys asking people directly about their feeling of being happy according to (Cantril ladder).The main objective of this paper is to shed the light on the importance of digital economy to the measure the world happiness. The power of digital economy is its ability to measure every human activity including petty cash spending that represent regular family spending. It also has the ability to record and trace financial transactions pertinent to environmental activities.The importance of this paper is due to reintroducing economy, one more time, through digital economy as a driving force in measuring happiness.The research found that United Arab Emirates was on the top of the ladder of both digital economy and country happiness in the Middle East, but it was not included in details in this research due to insufficient data.Canada was selected due to several reasons, those reasons are: Canada is one of the big seven (G2); It is one of the leading countries in digital economy in the world; Canada is ranked as number seven in the united nations happiness report in both 6022 report and 6022 report; and finally, the most important criteria “data is available”.Data analysis of Canadian economy shows that Canada is moving rapidly in the path of digital economy specially in the years 6022 and 6022 where Canada was ranked number seven in the world HPI.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,283
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,362
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle