MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4300951621 · doi:10.2307/3654700

Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity

2004· article· en· W4300951621 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sean P. Hier, Ron Eyerman

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRace, History, and American Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyIdentity (music)Gender studiesCriminologyAnthropologyAestheticsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity Sean P. Hier Ron Eyerman , Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 302. There is an important distinction to be respected concerning the analytic fields which comprise "history" and "collective memory." Whereas the former delineates the terrain of the event, often recorded and reproduced in the form of institutionalized knowledge and symbolized by material artifacts and physical objects, the latter denotes the culmination of the spatially and temporally situated needs and desires of a generation, a negotiation of the present deriving from an engagement with the past. Material artifacts and physical objects, in other words, possess the potentiality to evoke a sense of the past, but it is the articulation of an assemblage of discourses which serve to grant temporal stability to what form those representations assume. Inspired by, and making good use of, discourse theory and the mediated generational character of cultural memory, Ron Eyerman invokes the notion of "cultural trauma" to exemplify the cultural memory of slavery in the imagination of the African American collective. Cultural trauma, Eyerman explains, is inherently representational by nature. Neither does it necessitate the direct experience of the members comprising the collective, nor does it in any final sense correspond to the beliefs and aspirations of an homogenous group. From Du Bois' narration of the "sorrow songs" to the discourses which comprise late 20th century film, the mediation of cultural trauma persists and continues to shape African American identity. In this emergent identity forged through trauma, slavery does not correspond to an experience, only to a point of origin. But it is that point of origin from which the formation of black identity in America has emerged. And it is against this alluring backdrop that Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity commences. In Eyerman's assessment, cultural trauma as it pertains to the formation of African American identity derives not so much from the experience but the experiential mediation of slavery. In the aftermath of American slavery, [End Page 317] reconstruction brought great anticipation for what the future promised to freed slaves. Educating children and establishing religious and educational institutions was paramount. From the sources of empowerment which persisted under conditions of servitude would emerge the future of the emancipated slave. Former slaves, in other words, were less focused on what was than what will be. The failure of reconstruction to deliver its promises of equality and acceptance signified the point at which the memory of slavery, cultural trauma, emerged as an important discursive resource for identity formation within the black collective. This of course neither implies a uniform process of identity building nor does it constitute essentialism. It does, however, draw attention to the argument that from the ashes of myriad ethnic distinctions — Ibo, Ashanti, Igba, etc. — emerged the social construction of blackness, race and, importantly, difference. Hence, the cultural trauma that was and remains slavery is, for Eyerman, the trauma of failed emancipation. Facilitated by the ascendance of an upwardly mobile, educated, black middle class comprised of charismatic intellectuals through the first half of the twentieth century — artists, writers, teachers, lawyers, journalists etc. — gaining control of black representation in a climate of a reactionary dominant society became paramount. Aided to a considerable extent by the expansion of the media of mass communications, Eyerman maintains that the question of how African peoples of the world should be represented has remained embedded in the popular consciousness of black intellectuals since the failed years of reconstruction. Through a fascinating exploration of art, music, literature, radio, television and film, Cultural Trauma probes the internal conflicts over the form and meaning of representation and culture in successive generations of black Americans after slavery. Drawing from Du Bois, Garvey, Washington, Hurston, McCall, Johnson, Frazier, Locke, Elijah Muhammad and more, Eyerman details the continuous conflict which saw the rise and fall of a Black public sphere. Engaging the diversity and complexity of the social movements that emerged in the aftermath of reconstruction through the acceleration of the New Negro, the Harlem Resistance, Black Nationalism and Civil Rights, as well as the role of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,097

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,030
Communication savante0,0100,005
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations87
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology→Même sujetRace, History, and American Society→Travaux en français237 207→