The intersections of policy, practice and experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter outlines how discourse in policy and practice can be linked with older people's experiences of transition in late life. It moves beyond academic understandings of transition, providing the conceptual background and methodological means to reinterpret transitions as they are presented in social policy discourse. Rather than treating the study of social policy and the analysis of lived experience as separate, this chapter is drawn to an understanding of what happens at the intersections of these sites. First, it outlines how policy discourse may be understood to represent and shape socio-cultural interpretations of ageing and late life. Second, it outlines how a narrative approach can be used to access the storylines told in public policy and older people's accounts, and the link between the two. Third, it outlines how these ideas were used in the Late Life Transitions project that forms the basis of the book. This linked approach provides the foundation to consider the models that shape late life, and the ways in which older people may use these ideas to negotiate socio-cultural and personal constructs of ageing. Together, a storied approach to late life can provide new ways of understanding expectations and interpretations of transitions in late life as taking place in the intersections between policies, discourses, organisational practices and lived experience. In doing so, the approach builds on and links critical traditions in gerontology from structural and humanist perspectives. It outlines both how older people's experience may be shaped through ideas such as those articulated by academic study and public policy practices, and how older people may draw on, negotiate or contest the expressed ideas about ageing and transitions in their own lives. Although focus on policy has always been central to the study of ageing from a critical perspective (Estes, 1979; Phillipson, 1982; Walker, 1982), contemporary planning issues have brought debates on ageing to the fore. In recent years, concerns for transitions related to ageing and late life have resurfaced through debates on the age of eligibility for retirement benefits, and ideas on how to best achieve productive and successful ageing (see Moody, 2001). Underlying the attention to issues of ageing are concerns for financial stability amid shifting demographics, ensuring productivity over the lifecourse, and attempts to reduce fiscal expenditure on costs such as pensions (Gee and Gutman, 2000).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».