Book Reviews
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The first volume of Schlegel's two-volume work on Russian verbal aspect is conceived as a textbook and provides the theoretical bases that underlie the practical language exercises contained in the companion volume.It begins with an indispensable index of numerous terminological abbreviations as well as explanations of signs and symbols to which the reader or language learner must constantly refer, if only to justify their role as graphic explanations of the complex relations described in the work.Unfortunately, the abbreviations and explanations are arranged topically rather than alphabetically and are grouped by theoretical concept.The abbreviations-both German and Russian-reflect a very broad spectrum of concepts common to both traditional aspectology (e.g., terminativity/aterminativity, perfective/imperfective aspect, Aktionsarten, and so on) and the particular theory propounded here, including: differential semantic traits; temporal and aspectual reference points; "event," "speech," and "reference" as understood in the framework of Reichenbach's temporal logic; and "state of affairs" (aktionale Situation), i.e., actions, states, and events.Terminativity (telicity) also plays an important role in the application of graphic symbols alongside such concepts as "duration" (Dauer), "iterativity"/"repetition" (Wiederholung), "sequence of actions" (Handlungskette), "parallelism of actions" (Parallelität von Handlungen), "incidence" (Inzidenz), etc.An appendix, which brings together the definitions of the principal aspectological concepts (pp.307-313), also serves as a doubtless necessary aid to users of this work.The textbook is intended primarily for use at the university level.Given the complexity of the grammatical category of aspect, the book's stated goal is to provide-by means of a "multimodal and multidimensional approach"-a theory with sufficient "explanatory force" for practical language use (p.17).As presented in chapter 2 (pp.21-34), the basic mechanisms of aspect use are understood as interactions between verbs and the context(s) in which they occur, verbs being defined basically by actionality (lexical aspect) and "terminativity" (i.e., telicity), with context(s) similarly classified according to "terminativity."The aspectual system is viewed as a projection of the temporal system onto individual time intervals (p.31), a kind of temporal microsystem whereby any given action is situated relative to an "aspectual reference point," i.e., a point in time to which the speaker refers or at which the speaker mentally situates her/himself (this stands in contrast to tense, whereby any given action is situated relative to the moment of speech).Chapter 3 is devoted to the formal expression of the category of aspect in Russian (pp.35-98), including Aktionsarten (both in the narrow sense of lexical derivation and in the broader sense of lexical semantics) as well as correlative pairs of verbs of motion and their delineation vis-à-vis aspectual pairs per se.While recognizing as "true" aspectual pairs those whose imperfective members are derived through stem suffixation, Schlegel also acknowledges so-called "functional aspectual pairs" like pisat'/napisat' 'write', which are formed "pleonastically" by means of a semantically redundant verbal prefix (an appropriate view from the standpoint of both theory and actual language use; see summarizing table, p. 98).The remaining chapters are devoted to the functions of the verbal aspects and the uses made of them, beginning with a broad range of meanings in the indicative mood (pp.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,709 | 0,642 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».