Policy and biopolitics: the event of race-based statistics in Toronto
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I think … [the establishment of a Black-focused school] took so long because we’re all very comfortable, and we’ve become very complacent in how we treat students in our schools, and more specifically, how we treat students of colour within our schools. It has been suggested time and time and time again, and we will have a shooting in a school, we will have a death in a school, and somebody else will recommend … [a Black-focused school], and everybody says, ‘yeah, great idea! We really should deal with this because students’, Black students’ self-esteem is down a hole and we need to do something about it’. And we talk and we nod and we smile, and then we forget about it. (Weiss, 2010: film time 11.00–11.56) There was momentum to introduce Black-focused schooling in Toronto in the early 1990s, assisted by the election of the social democratic New Democratic Party at the time. In 1991, a Black Secretariat was formed by the provincial government, and ideas about Black-focused schooling were proposed in 1992 by a multilevel Ontario government working group, the Four-level Government/African Canadian Community Working Group. As part of recommendations in their report Towards a new beginning , the working group proposed a targeted programme called ‘Focussed School’ to be implemented in schools that had high percentages of Black/African Canadian students in each of the cities making up Greater Toronto (Ontario Government/African Canadian Community Working Group, 1992). The arguments for Black-focused schools in Toronto emphasised the need for a Black-oriented curriculum as an intervention into ongoing educational and social disadvantage for Black students. This meant arguing for curriculum change in existing public schools in addition to proposing separate ‘Black-focused’ schools (Dei, 1995; James, 2011). However, by the mid-1990s and early 2000s the idea of Black-focused schooling had entered a hiatus, with a decline in focus on racial issues brought about by a combination of a change in provincial government in 1995, with a Conservative government in power until 2003, and the dismantling of the Ontario Anti-Racism Secretariat by the incoming government, and the reorganisation of the Greater Toronto School District.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».