<i>AWWA Water Science</i> Author Spotlight
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Having published an article in AWWA Water Science, Javier Locsin answered questions from the publication's editor-in-chief, Kenneth L. Mercer, about the research. Potential Regulatory Implications of Health Canada's New Lead Guideline Javier M. Locsin, Benjamin F. Trueman, Dallys Serracin-Pitti, Gillian M.L. Stanton, and Graham A. Gagnon Javier enjoys bingsu at a restaurant in Vancouver. I was raised with a strong work ethic, which has been monumentally important for maintaining my momentum in graduate school. Most importantly, my natural curiosity has led me to places and people that have positively affected my career. I was fortunate to have three mentors—Dr. Graham Gagnon, my PhD supervisor, taught me how to design and execute rigorous academic research and write up results as a story that can be both analytically critical and interesting to read. Dr. Benjamin Trueman taught me how to connect fundamental science with practical application. Dr. Evelyne Doré provided often humorous advice about how to survive academia but most importantly, to embrace the chaos in learning. Health Canada released an updated Lead in Drinking water guidance document in 2019. The main changes were the reduction of the maximum allowable lead concentration from 10 to 5 μg/L and the replacement of flushed sampling with either random daytime or 30-min stagnation sampling. The two new sampling protocols were expected to capture higher lead concentrations and increase the likelihood of a utility being out of compliance with regulations. To prepare for the changes and assess their effects on utilities in Nova Scotia, we partnered with Nova Scotia Environment, as well as large and small water utilities, to understand lead levels in drinking water. We compared old and new sampling protocols for measuring lead at the tap. First is the communication and implementation of water research. Advances in research may happen quickly, and we need to more effectively distribute this information. Second is identifying sustainable alternatives to current practices. Finally, educating and encouraging our communities to actively participate in the field of water resource management will be a challenge, whether it be through source water protection or monitoring, policy, or treatment practices. Javier, his parents, and sister have dinner during a visit to Prince Edward Island. I grew up in the Philippines but was fortunate to travel and be exposed to many different places and cultures. Each of these places experienced different water challenges and applied varied approaches in addressing them. I gained a unique perspective on managing issues. Bouldering or scuba diving can provide relief from my everyday analytical thinking and still stimulate my problem-solving skills. I enjoy listening to music while reading a good book and hanging out with my dog, Fisher. I am also a foodie; I believe that food is one of the best ways to experience new cultures. To learn more about Javier's research, visit the article, available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1182.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».