Afterword. Relational entanglements: ageing, materialities and embodiments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“Ageing, it sure isn't what it used to be.” So quipped a woman in her 80s when interviewed about her media and communication practices. When I pressed her to explain, she simply nodded towards her large screen television, the remote controls on the coffee table, her mobile phone and the tablet computer that was a recent gift from her children. With a wry laugh and a nod of the head, she articulated much with embodied economical eloquence. Her choice of phrase, her gestures and the sight of this plethora of digital techno-media in her living room immediately brought to mind images of visits with my Baba (grandmother) some 30 years earlier. My Baba's life, of course, was not absent of either media or technologies. She had newly bought a microwave oven with a digital readout to warm dishes from the small chest freezer tucked in her hall closet. Her daily routines were synched to the rhythms and flows of her favourite shows, or “my stories” as she called them, on her television. She often noted how her experiences of ageing were distinct from that of her mother, mostly for the better in her opinion. She had her own private telephone not a “party line”. She never felt the pressure to don a ‘babushka’ (a traditional Ukrainian head covering) even when attending church at Easter. My relationship with my grandmother gave me a lasting view of the intimate flows of everyday life that constitute the meanings of growing older. Her world of ageing, full of moments, engagements, things and experiences, created a meshing of resources that also contextualised her time and place, the 1980s in Manitoba, Canada, when austerity programmes were not in full swing either federally or provincially. She had access to a variety of health and home-care services then provided by the provincial government. (If she were alive, I am sure she would have noted, with dismay, how successive changes to pensions, rates of inflation, and cutbacks to subsidised services would have transformed her everyday life and conditions of existence.) When we are privileged enough to be in touch with and touched by an older person, we can learn how the seemingly ordinary contexts of their everyday life are maps and paths to understanding the wider culture in which ageing is situated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,034 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».