MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4302396764 · doi:10.1353/phx.2010.0016

The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire by Clifford Ando

2010· article· en· W4302396764 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Celia E. Schultz

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsClothingBalance (ability)SwiftEmpireAtmosphere (unit)SociologyFocus (optics)AestheticsLawHistoryLiteratureArtPsychologyPolitical scienceGeographyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK REV1EWS/COMPTES RENDUS 457 Bablitz's third chapter attempts to explore the gender balance of recorded litigants, their geographical provenance, and various kinds of "typical litigants," before moving on to a more general consideration of the socio-economic and socio-political factors that influenced their behaviour and "emotional states." The brief sections on litigants' stressed-out emotions, the symbolism of their "dark and dirty" clothing, and the idea of the litigant as a theatrical actor open up new and exciting areas for research. Bablitz chooses to defer her extended discussion of more traditional themes, such as how Roman patronage relationships operated within forensic contexts, to Chapter Six on "The Advocate." In Chapter Four she argues that the role of the judge within the Roman courtroom was "more passive than that of the advocate or even the audience" (89), as well as offering an extended discussion of Demougin on the epigraphical evidence for the album iudicum. In Chapter Five Bablitz succeeds admirably in proving that: "The Roman courtroom was a strikingly fluid environment filled with noise and movement, and much of this atmosphere can be attributed to the activities of the audience" (120). Again, the focus is on how the audience "participated" in courtroom processes, including some cautious discussion of the "hired audience" or "paid claque." This chapter also includes a fascinating list—drawn from Martial—of verbal exclamations shouted in court: "Good going! Weighty hit! And swift! And nasty! Well done! Beautiful! That's what I wanted!" (133). Chapters Six and Seven turn to the advocate: "the central element in the Roman courtroom, the lynchpin between the various participants" (141). The discussion here extends to inspired reconstructions of advocates' caseloads, working hours and even their use of forensic props, including portraits of murder victims and reconstructions of crime scenes painted on canvas. Bablitz's rich and detailed research more than justifies her conclusion that "the concrete theatrical elements" of courtrooms "cannot be overlooked." This is a fundamental insight that modern legal scholars are only just beginning to acknowledge, as lawyer and writer Geoffrey Robertson does: "It seemed at times that we were all serving the interests of entertainment: American lawyers in London over for their Bar conference would jostle for seats in the public gallery as they might at a theatre, their roars of laughter silenced by ushers booming cries of'Silence!' followed by the judge's regular threat to clear the public gallery. 'This is a courtroom, not a theatre,' he would remind them repeatedly. John Mortimer would leave the courtroom each afternoon for the Vaudeville Theatre (where A Voyage Round My Father was being rehearsed) with a sense that he was returning to real life."1 Birkbeck College, University of London Caroline Humfress The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire. By Clifford Ando. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2008. Pp. xxiv, 239. In this collection of new and previously published essays, Clifford Ando argues that the Romans' religious actions were motivated by an empirical knowledge of, rather than faith in, their gods' abilities and interests. If a ritual was effective—meaning it persuaded the gods to show favor to the Romans—it would be repeated as necessary until it no longer achieved the desired results. In that case, the rite might be altered or abandoned. The very prosperity and growth of the Roman empire was itself proof that the Romans were worshipping the right gods in the right way. 1G. Robertson, The Justice Game (London 1999) 27-28. 458 PHOENIX This conclusion will not be new to those working in Roman religion, but they are only a portion of Ando's intended audience. This book, taking part in an important trend in the field, attempts to bridge the long-standing gap between scholarship on Roman religion and the larger field of religious studies, particularly work done in the area of early Christianity and the New Testament. In his introduction, Ando admonishes his fellow classicists to consider how to present Roman religion to scholars of more contemporary religions. His sophisticated analysis of the development of ideas about religion and empire is far from popularizing or generalizing, and although there are some things to object to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,177
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetClassical Antiquity StudiesTravaux en français237 207