In a large dataset of primary care patients, use of CHA2DS2-VA score leads to almost universal recommendation for anticoagulation in those aged 65 years and over with atrial fibrillation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC) for high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients can reduce stroke risk by two-thirds. From 2012–14, the OAC treatment recommendation threshold in international guidelines moved from CHADS2 ≥2 to CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women), equivalent to a “sexless” CHA2DS2-VA≥2. This move aimed to identify truly low risk patients who did not need OAC treatment. General practitioners (GPs) report barriers about assessing patient suitability for OAC. Objectives To compare the proportion of AF patients for whom OAC treatment is recommended under CHADS2 ≥2 and CHA2DS2-VA ≥2, and to look at the drivers of any differences, using an existing dataset. Methods Analyses were conducted on a large Australian general practice dataset collated during previous studies (2011–2019), with deidentified data extracted from the clinical records system at a single timepoint for regularly-attending adult patients from 164 practices. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VA scores were calculated for AF patients with sufficient data available and the proportion with CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VA ≥2 was compared using chi-square tests. Results There were records for 340,463 patients, of which 285,635 (8,294 with AF) had sufficient data to calculate CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VA scores. Among AF patients of all ages, the CHA2DS2-VA ≥2 threshold captured a significantly higher proportion than CHADS2≥2 (85% vs 68%, p<0.0001). In AF patients aged ≥65 years, the CHA2DS2-VA ≥2 threshold also captured a significantly higher proportion than CHADS2 ≥2 (96% vs 76%, p<0.0001). Almost all older patients (≥65 years) who were captured by CHA2DS2-VA ≥2 but not CHADS2 ≥2 (n=1395) qualified on the basis of age, with only 1.4% eligible because of age 65–74 years and vascular disease history. Conclusions The change from CHAD2 to CHA2DS2-VA has resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients with AF being recommended OAC treatment under the guidelines, driven almost entirely by the revised scoring for age. Among AF patients aged ≥65 years, almost all (96%) were recommended OAC treatment under CHA2DS2-VA, demonstrating that AF is strongly associated with other vascular pathology. These findings support the Canadian guidelines, which recommend OAC treatment for all AF cases aged ≥65 years. The findings also reinforce the argument that AF screening in those aged ≥65 years is justified, as almost all patients with prevalent AF in that age group are eligible for OAC treatment. These results suggest could be an argument for simplifying the treatment message for GPs, which may reduce barriers and further improve treatment rates. High rates of associated vascular pathology in AF patients suggest that additional management strategies are also justified, including promotion of exercise, smoking cessation, and treatment of associated conditions such as hypertension and diabetes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): RACGP Foundation / HCF Research Foundation GrantUniversity of Notre Dame Australia Research Grant
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».