Echocardiographic assessment alone is inadequate for determining elevated left sided filling pressures in patients with cardiogenic shock
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) filling pressure assessment is of paramount importance in tailoring treatments for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). ESC guidelines advocate for the use of mitral inflow Doppler and mitral annulus tissue Doppler measurements to predict elevated left atrial pressure in clinical practice. Echocardiographic measurement of LA pressures could reduce the need for invasive monitoring in CS patients, but its utility remains unproven in this population. Purpose We assessed the validity of mitral inflow velocity and mitral annulus velocity indices to determine LA pressures, correlating them with invasive measurement of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in CS patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Methods We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary artery catheter insertion in the CICU, measuring their haemodynamic parameters, including PCWP. This was immediately followed by a transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed by a critical care cardiologist, blinded to the invasive measurements. The early (E) and late (A) mitral inflow velocities were measured using mitral inflow Doppler and septal and lateral mitral annulus velocities (e') were measured using tissue Doppler, all in the apical 4-chamber view. TTE images were later reported by a second cardiologist, blinded to the invasive measurements and the patient. Correlations between E; E/A ratio; E/e' ratio and PCWP were evaluated using Pearson's correlation. Results Sixty patients were recruited into the study, aged 58±14 years, 27% female, with 96 assessments undertaken. The majority (55%) of patients were SCAI stage C, with 14% having had a cardiac arrest prior to CICU admission and 27% required mechanical ventilation at the time of assessment. Mean PCWP was 16.0±6.5 mmHg. Full mitral valve Doppler and tissue Doppler profiles were measured in 67 (70%) assessments, limited due to E/A fusion, atrial fibrillation and limited acoustic windows. There was only weak correlation between PCWP and E/A ratio (R=0.33, p=0.01), with no correlation between PCWP and the other measured values (Table 1), including E/e'. The AUC for identifying patients with elevated PCWP (≥15 mmHg) using E/A ratio was 0.67 (p=0.02), although there was no suitable value to use as a cut off with adequate sensitivity and specificity (Figure 1). Conclusion Echocardiographic non-invasive assessment of left sided cardiac filling pressures is technically challenging in patients with CS. Even when possible, there is weak correlation between echocardiographic and invasive measurements, suggesting limited value in this technique. Alternative non-invasive modalities, such as lung ultrasound, should be investigated in this population to assist clinical assessment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».