A PHASE 2 TRIAL OF ELRANATAMAB, A B-CELL MATURATION ANTIGEN (BCMA)-CD3 BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY, IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM): INITIAL SAFETY RESULTS FOR MAGNETISMM-3
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both BCMA-expressing MM cells and CD3-expressing T cells. MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) is an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elranatamab monotherapy in pts with R/R MM. Initial safety results are presented. MagnetisMM-3 enrolled pts who are refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. Pts were assigned to 1 of 2 independent, parallel cohorts: those naïve to BCMA-directed therapies (Cohort A) and those with previous exposure to BCMA-directed antibody-drug conjugates or CAR-T cells (Cohort B). Pts received SQ elranatamab 76 mg QW on a 28-d cycle with a 2-step-up priming dose regimen administered during the first wk. Dose modifications were permitted for toxicity. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by CTCAE (v5.0), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) by ASTCT criteria. As of the data cutoff on Dec 31, 2021, 60 pts in Cohort A had received ≥1 dose of elranatamab; the last pt's first dose was ̃2 mos prior to the cutoff. Median age was 69.0 yrs (range, 44-89), 48.3% were male, 63.3% were white, 18.3% were Asian and 11.7% were Black/African American. At baseline, 60.0% of pts had an ECOG performance status 1-2 and pts had received a median of 5 (range, 2-12) prior therapies. Median duration of elranatamab treatment was 9.57 wks (range, 0.1-46.1); median relative dose intensity was 87.4% (range, 23.1-101.4). TEAEs were reported in 100% (Grade [G] 3/4, 75.0%) of pts. Most common (≥30%) hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (36.7% [G3/4, 35.0%]), anemia (36.7% [G3/4, 30.0%]) and thrombocytopenia (30.0% [G3/4, 21.7%]). Among pts who received the 2-step-up priming regimen (n = 56), CRS and ICANS, respectively, were reported in 58.9% (G3/4, 0%) and 3.6% (G3/4, 0%); of those pts, 57.6% (n = 19/33) and 100% (n = 2/2) received tocilizumab and/or steroids. Most common (≥30%) non-hematologic TEAE, other than CRS/ICANS, was fatigue (31.7% [G3/4, 3.3%]). Infections were reported in 46.7% (G3/4, 18.3%) of pts; most frequently reported were upper respiratory tract infections (11.7% [G3/4, 0%]). Discontinuations due to adverse events were reported in 5.0% of pts. No pts permanently discontinued treatment due to CRS or ICANS. There were 10 deaths; causes were MM progression (n = 8), septic shock (n = 1) and unknown (n = 1). Data will be updated at the time of presentation to include 90 pts. Preliminary results in pts with R/R MM and no prior BCMA-targeted treatment suggest that 76 mg QW elranatamab with a 2-step-up priming regimen is well tolerated, with no G≥3 CRS or ICANS observed. These results support the continued development of elranatamab monotherapy for pts with MM. The MagnetisMM program continues to evaluate elranatamab alone and in combination with other drugs for the treatment of pts with MM. ©2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. The abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Also presented at the European Hematology Association 2022 Hybrid Congress.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».