Award Citation: The Charles H. Levine Memorial Book Prize, 2022
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Argentina by Virginia Oliveros, as the 2022 recipients of the Levine Award.Drawing on a novel theoretical policy arenas framework and comparative empirical analyses of Switzerland, Germany, Canada, and the United States, Ellermann offers a fascinating and insightful investigation into the diversity of immigration policy choices, and the causes of policy change or persistence over time and across jurisdictions.The book offers a novel theoretical, conceptual, and empirical contribution to the institutional analysis of the politics of immigration policy making: Spatial and temporal stability and change in liberal and restrictive immigration policies across policy arenas are the products of distinct types of political insulation with their distinctive policy logics that inform the capacity of policy makers.It is a superb example of an innovative theoretical argument used to understand a pressing public policy issue that pushes the public policy literature forward by emphasizing both actor preferences and institutional settings forming arenas to pursue them.A masterful achievement and a must-read for immigration scholars, political and policy scientists, institutionalists, and policy makers."How does patronage actually work in Argentina?"The issue of patronage has been widely studied, but how patronage works, has been rarely studied empirically.Drawing on laborious qualitative and quantitative analyses, Oliveros argues that patronage jobs are distributed to public sector employees in exchange for political services such as helping with campaigns and electoral support.In doing so, civil servants serve the success of their incumbent political masters.Introducing a theory of "self-enforcing patronage", she shows that patronage employment continues not only because or as long as clients comply with their patrons but also because patronage contracts are self-sustaining when they are distributed to supporters whose fates are tied to the fates of the politicians who hired them.The research design for studying such an alternative patronage mechanism entails a unique face-to-face survey, including list experiments, that has been fielded among mid-level public employees in three Argentinean municipalities.The book provides strong evidence for this mechanism of "self-enforcing patronage" and discusses the institutional features supporting this patronage, extending its relevance to other Latin American countries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle