A theory-driven intervention delivered by email to promote physical activity in women who are overweight or obese: Participants’ perspectives on acceptability and usability within the context of a three-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Insufficient physical activity and excess weight increase illness risk for women. Email-delivered interventions may be a solution for offering accessible, cost-effective, brief support to women to increase their engagement in physical activity. This study explored participants’ perspectives of the acceptability and usability of a theory-driven, email-delivered intervention coupled with a wearable activity monitor designed to promote physical activity in women who were insufficiently active and overweight/obese. Methods: In this three-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial (unblinded), participants allocated to the main intervention arm received a fully automated intervention consisting of: (a) six weekly emails, (b) a Polar A300 activity monitor (with access to the Polar website and companion smartphone application), and (c) a copy of the Canadian physical activity guidelines for adults (18-64 years). Email content, informed by self-determination theory, was designed to enhance autonomous motivation for physical activity through fostering perceptions of competence, autonomy, and relatedness by sharing motivational and behaviour change techniques to promote needs satisfaction. Post-intervention, participants completed an acceptability survey containing open- and closed-ended questions online. Descriptive and content analyses were performed for responses to closed- and open-ended questions, respectively. Results: Data from 14 women (age range=18-63 years, mean body mass index=31.3±5.8 kg/m2) who received the main intervention and completed the post-intervention survey were analyzed. Qualitative data indicated most were satisfied with the intervention and appreciated that emails prompted self-reflection, kept them on track and accountable, provided informational support, and were non-pressuring. Further, it suggested the monitor was “enjoyable” and “helpful;” quantitative data corroborated this as 71.4% said the monitor was “very valuable/absolutely valuable,” 71.7% would “very probably/definitely” still use one, and 85.7% wore it ≥5 days/week for ≥8 hours/day and checked it “occasionally/frequently/very frequently.” However, potential threats to acceptability were noted, including “long” and “text-heavy” emails, lack of personal contact, and cumbersome, non-aesthetic monitors. Conclusions: Results suggest this self-determination theory-driven email-delivered intervention may be an acceptable low-contact approach to help promote physical activity in women who are overweight or obese and insufficiently active, although improvements are warranted and studies ascertaining its effectiveness are needed. Nonetheless, results may inform the development or refinement of similar interventions in other contexts. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03601663, Date: July 26, 2018; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03601663).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».