32 How do Children with Medical Complexity Die? A Scoping Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background While children with medical complexity (CMC) are recognized as an emerging and unique cohort, end of life remains poorly understood and little is known about illness trajectory, decision making and communication experiences for this group of patients and their families. Objectives This scoping review aimed to describe existing literature on the characteristics of end of life in CMC. Design/Methods The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase) were searched up to June 2021. Studies reporting children, adolescents and young adults who were at end of life and fulfilled the definitional framework of medical complexity by Cohen et al were included by two independent reviewers. Data on study aims, design, methods, outcome measures and key findings were extracted, followed by quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results. Results Of 1535 publications initially identified, 23 studies were included. In terms of study characteristics, 20 (87.0%) studies were quantitative, 15 (65.2%) were published from 2015 to 2021 and 14 (70.0%) originated from the USA. Study outcomes were categorized into 5 main groups: (1) Place of death (30.8%), (2) Health care use (23.1%), (3) Interventions received or withdrawn (17.9%) (4) Decision making and communication (12.8%) and (5) Others (15.4%). These outcomes were found to be associated with sociodemographic factors and CMC diagnostic categories. Majority of CMC deaths occurred in hospitals and the mean proportion of hospital deaths reported was 68.8% (33.5% to 91.9%). Studies evaluated health care utilization at end of life in various settings including hospice, home care, hospital and the intensive care unit. Interventions studied in this cohort included mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hemodialysis, procedures and medication use. Studies reported that CMC were subjected to more intensive interventions when compared to non-CMC. The 2 main themes which emerged from qualitative studies were that of advance care planning experiences and the unique end of life experiences of CMC and their families. Conclusion This scoping review highlighted the unique characteristics of end of life in CMC and outlined the emerging body of literature as well as knowledge gaps on this topic. A better understanding of this cohort of CMC would serve to inform clinical practice, service development and future research opportunities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,087 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,017 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».