Differentiation of high grade glioma and solitary brain metastases by measuring relative cerebral blood volume and fractional anisotropy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI diagnostic test accuracy studies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to research the efficacy of MRI (I) for differentiating high-grade glioma (HGG) (P) with solitary brain metastasis (SBM) (C) by creating a combination of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) (O) and fractional anisotropy (FA) (O) in patients with intracerebral tumors. METHODS: Searches were conducted on September 2021 with no publication date restriction, using an electronic search for related articles published in English, from PubMed (1994 to September 2021), Scopus (1977 to September 2021), Web of Science (1985 to September 2021), and Cochrane (1997 to September 2021). A total of 1056 studies were found, with 23 used for qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. Inclusion criteria were: patients diagnosed with HGG and SBM without age, sex, or race restriction; MRI examination of rCBV and FA; reliable histopathological diagnostic method as the gold-standard for all conditions of interest; observational and clinical studies. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS) and Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB) for observational and clinical trial studies were managed to appraise the quality of individual studies included. Data extraction results were managed using Mendeley and Excel, pooling data synthesis was completed using the Review Manager 5.4 software with random effect model to discriminate HGG and SBM, and divided into four subgroups. RESULTS: There were 23 studies included with a total sample size of 597 HGG patients and 373 control groups/SBM. The analysis was categorized into four subgroups: (1) the subgroup with rCBV values in the central area of the tumor/intratumoral (399 HGG and 232 SBM) shows that HGG patients are not significantly different from SBM/controls group (SMD [95% CI] = -0.27 [-0.66, 0.13]), 2) the subgroup with rCBV values in the peritumoral area (452 HGG and 274 SBM) shows that HGG patients are significantly higher than SBM (SMD [95% CI] = -1.23 [-1.45 to -1.01]), (3) the subgroup with FA values in the central area of the tumor (249 HGG and 156 SBM) shows that HGG patients are significantly higher than SBM (SMD [95% CI] = - 0.44 [-0.84,-0.04]), furthermore (4) the subgroup with FA values in the peritumoral area (261 HGG and 168 SBM) shows that the HGG patients are significantly higher than the SBM (SMD [95% CI] = -0.59 [-1.02,-0.16]). CONCLUSION: for the FA in the peritumoral subgroup was 74%. The predefined accurate search criteria, and precise selection and evaluation of methodological quality for included studies, strengthen this studyOur study has no funder, no conflict of interest, and followed an established PROSPERO protocol (ID: CRD42021279106). ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The combination of rCBV and FA measurements' results is promising in differentiating HGG and SBM.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».