The role of frailty score in early surgical treatment of elderly cholecystitis patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives: The average life expectancy is increasing all over the world, and as a result, the number of elderly patients is increasing. Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common diseases requiring emergency surgical treatment in the elderly. In the literature, it has been reported that in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis, physicians do not fully comply with the current literature recommendations due to some concerns and do not apply surgical treatment in the early period. The concept of frailty, which has come to the fore in geriatric assessment today, provides objective information about the general health status of the patient. In our study, the role of frailty assessment in the decision made regarding the early surgery in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis treated in our hospital was investigated. Methods: In our study, the clinical features, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) frailty scale, treatment modalities and prognosis of patients over the age of 65 who were treated with the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis between January 2018 and January 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Of the 182 patients included in the study, 24 (13.2%) were found to be frail. It was observed that the mean age and multi-morbidity were higher in the frail group (p < 0.001). It was observed that the mean C-reactive protein and leukocyte values, which are inflammatory mediators, increased in both groups, both fragile and non-fragile, and complicated cholecystitis accompanied by cholangitis or pancreatitis was observed in a total of 64 (35.16%) patients. There were 57 (31.3%) patients using anticoagulant or antiaggregant agents. The patients were most frequently treated with medical treatment (n = 108; 59.3%), the other treatment methods were early surgery ( (n = 46; 25.3%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n = 22; 12.1%) and percutaneous cholecystostomy (n = 11; 6.0%). Surgical treatment was more common in ASA I and II patients, and percutaneous cholecystostomy was more common in frail patients (p < 0.001). There were 20 (14.70%) patients who were re-admitted to the hospital and 6 (3.29%) patients ended up with mortality. No statistical relationship could be demonstrated between these conditions and frailty (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of the elderly cholecystitis patients, early surgical treatment is the most favorable treatment method in order to reduce re-admission and prevent possible complications. However, we think that a detailed geriatric evaluation should be made in a multidisciplinary manner for the decision making regarding the of surgical treatment of elderly patients, and frailty evaluation should also be made in this context.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».