MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W430775092

Canadian Women & the Struggle for Equality by Lorna Marsden

2014· article· en· W430775092 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Okori Uneke

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational social science review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)CitizenshipConstitutionImmigrationSociologyGender studiesLawSuffragePoliticsPolitical scienceHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Marsden, Lorna R. Canadian Women & Struggle for Equality. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2012. xi + 290 pages. Hardcover, $29.99. Canadian Women & Struggle for Equality is a historical-sociological account of transformational process women went through in their quest for equality in Canada. Lorna R. Marsden, a sociologist, activist, former Canadian senator, and former university president, recounts long road toward equality women have traveled. She discusses this struggle in context of evolution of law, demographics, labor force, health care, immigration, and world wars. In effect, this book aims at a comprehensive explanation of how women and women's organizations contributed to social change and how sociological circumstances within which major improvements in status of women in Canada came to pass. The focus is on means through which Canadian women and their male supporters succeeded in moving their agendas into law or common practice. What is remarkable was that social change in Canada was slow and accretive, and struggle for women's equality occurred without social strife or acrimonious debate. The author traces gender inequality in Canada to British North America (BNA) of 1867, which became basis of Canadian constitution. The first major flaw of BNA was the complete omission of rights or recognition of women. Women neither participated directly in nor were mentioned as a group in debates that led to BNA Act (p. 30). As a result, women were ignored in public life. Voting rights excluded women, and women's citizenship was tied until 1946 to their husbands or fathers. If a woman married a non-British subject, she automatically lost, along with other citizenship rights, right of franchise. Married women were (or were expected to be) dependent on their husbands' income and could not seek paid employment outside home. Single or widowed women were expected to live on modest means. Women were not likely to consider themselves equal to men and, even if contemplated, opportunities in public domain to express such beliefs were limited. While women could vote in public elections in 1960s, there were very few female representatives in legislatures or courts. Furthermore, only married women had access to birth control. In fact, general perception was that women achieved a higher moral status through motherhood. Consequently, women were not only relegated to maternal role, but were also denied any significant role in other aspects of society. Even marriage did not confer equality on women, as evidenced in Irene Murdoch Case in Alberta in 1973, in which Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Mrs. Murdoch, despite building and maintaining family ranch together with her husband, was not entitled to an interest in lands. Some historical events, notably involvement of women in First and Second World Wars, helped create economic opportunities and improve women's rights. Women's suffrage, for example, came as a consequence of war. While some provinces had granted women voting rights in municipal elections as property owners, Canadian Parliament debated whether provincial suffrage automatically gave women vote in federal elections. The law granting women federal vote came into force January 1, 1919. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,858
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational social science reviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207