NigraNet: An automatic framework to assess nigral neuromelanin content in early Parkinson’s disease using convolutional neural network
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Parkinson’s disease (PD) demonstrates neurodegenerative changes in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) using neuromelanin-sensitive (NM)-MRI. As SNc manual segmentation is prone to substantial inter-individual variability across raters, development of a robust automatic segmentation framework is necessary to facilitate nigral neuromelanin quantification. Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in the neuroimaging community for automated brain region segmentation tasks using MRI. Developing and validating AI-based NigraNet, a fully automatic SNc segmentation framework allowing nigral neuromelanin quantification in patients with PD using NM-MRI. We prospectively included 199 participants comprising 144 early-stage idiopathic PD patients (disease duration = 1.5 ± 1.0 years) and 55 healthy volunteers (HV) scanned using a 3 Tesla MRI including whole brain T1-weighted anatomical imaging and NM-MRI. The regions of interest (ROI) were delineated in all participants automatically using NigraNet, a modified U-net, and compared to manual segmentations performed by two experienced raters. The SNc volumes (Vol), volumes corrected by total intracranial volume (Cvol), normalized signal intensity (NSI) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed. One-way GLM-ANCOVA was performed while adjusting for age and sex as covariates. Diagnostic performance measurement was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Inter and intra-observer variability were estimated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The agreements between methods were tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on a mean-rating, two-way, mixed-effects model estimates for absolute agreement. Cronbach’s alpha and Bland-Altman plots were estimated to assess inter-method consistency. Using both methods, Vol, Cvol, NSI and CNR measurements differed between PD and HV with an effect of sex for Cvol and CNR. ICC values between the methods demonstrated optimal agreement for Cvol and CNR (ICC > 0.9) and high reproducibility (DSC: 0.80) was also obtained. The SNc measurements also showed good to excellent consistency values (Cronbach's alpha > 0.87). Bland-Altman plots of agreement demonstrated no association of SNc ROI measurement differences between the methods and ROI average measurements while confirming that 95% of the data points were ranging between the limits of mean difference (d ± 1.96xSD). Percentage changes between PD and HV were -27.4% and -17.7% for Vol, -30.0% and -22.2% for Cvol, -15.8% and -14.4% for NSI, -17.1% and -16.0% for CNR for automatic and manual measurements respectively. Using automatic method, in the entire dataset, we obtained the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.83 for Vol, 0.85 for Cvol, 0.79 for NSI and 0.77 for CNR whereas in the training dataset of 0.96 for Vol, 0.95 for Cvol, 0.85 for NSI and 0.85 for CNR. Disease duration correlated negatively with NSI of the patients for both the automatic and manual measurements. We presented an AI-based NigraNet framework that utilizes a small MRI training dataset to fully automatize the SNc segmentation procedure with an increased precision and more reproducible results. Considering the consistency, accuracy and speed of our approach, this study could be a crucial step towards the implementation of a time-saving non-rater dependent fully automatic method for studying neuromelanin changes in clinical settings and large-scale neuroimaging studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».